A rather strange reason given:
"Considering the complete lack of bugs in urpm and in the RPM package
format, which we’ve grown tired of, The Executive Committee has
approved the switch to Debian package manager, apt."
I would have thought that the "complete lack of bugs" would be a good
enough reason to stick with the RPM format, leaving time for other more pressing problems. The sentence reads as though RPM isn't sufficiently challenging. I was a bit surprised when RPM was set as the "standard" package. Maybe the new Board has different ideas.
https://blog.mageia.org/en/2021/04/01/emergency-updates-about-the-direction-of-mageia/
On 01/04/2021 10:58, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
A rather strange reason given:Today is April 1.........
"Considering the complete lack of bugs in urpm and in the RPM package
format, which we’ve grown tired of, The Executive Committee has
approved the switch to Debian package manager, apt."
I would have thought that the "complete lack of bugs" would be a good
enough reason to stick with the RPM format, leaving time for other
more pressing problems. The sentence reads as though RPM isn't
sufficiently challenging. I was a bit surprised when RPM was set as
the "standard" package. Maybe the new Board has different ideas.
https://blog.mageia.org/en/2021/04/01/emergency-updates-about-the-direction-of-mageia/
I always wondered why the basic RPM rpm needed so many upgrades, but
Mint (a Debian) distro, does the same.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 474 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 138:03:42 |
Calls: | 9,470 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,608 |
Messages: | 6,119,829 |