In every graph I put in the 2-second video of the railgun as motor experiment, to solidify the new idea that inertia can be violated with very positive results for energy and motion. That, is what my one-person company, HTN Research Pty Ltd is all about -
Intellectual Propery relating to energy, motion, modelling of complex non-linear systems with accurate predictions causing immediate gains... Well, the last was my career for over 40 years now, spanning areas from antennas and microwaves to databases
and call centre telephony quality of service.
In this graph we plot the motion of the entire system. It goes back when the armature accelerates, in tune with the acceleration of the armature. After that there is a drop in velocity when the armature no longer accelerates. Then as the armature hits
the arrestors, the whole gun stops for a little while, and then, totally contrary to the laws of physics, it starts to move forward!
What is happening is that there is more action than reaction. So there is a net gain in momentum. The reaction is NOT caused electrically, as it is for the action force causing the armature velocity. It is caused by the rolling of the armature pushing
back on the rails. Had the armature been SLIDING instead of rolling, this pushback would not have occured. The performance would have been more efficient.
To get into figures - with respect to the ground, the maximum velocity of the armature was 2.88m/s and as its mass is 2.98 Kg the momentum was 2.88*2.98=8.34Kg-m/s. There is no name for the momentum unit, so I hope they will call it Arindam one day. Well,
I do hope my friends here will indulge me when I say that as per this experiment the momentum of the armature was 8.34Arindams! Now the maximum velocity of the railgun-motor was -0.6938m/s and the mass is 8.72 Kg, so the backward recoil momentum at its
maximum was -0.6938*8.72=-6.05Arindams. Momentum is NOT getting conserved! There is a net momentum in the positive direction of the amount 8.34-6.05=2.29Arindams. Now once the armature has hit the stops, it is part of the whole system, which now weighs
2.98+8.72=11.7 Kg. The 2.29Arindams acting upon 11.7 Kg should give a velocity of 2.29/11.7 = 0.196m/s. The experimental result is slightly more, about 0.214m/s which roughly falls in the 10% area of accuracy.
Anyway, the main point is that after the "hit" the whole system in free space would keep on moving at 0.2 m/s. This let me repeat is without the use of rockets or throwing out anything, or pushing back anything, or blowing back anything. Works thus just
as any flying saucer should - cleanly and most efficiently.
Talking of efficiency, now. The kinetic energy it has got after one hit is 0.5mV^2 or 0.5*11.7*0.2^2 = 11.7*.02 = 0.234 joules. A small amount, got after we spent a huge amount of electric energy - roughly 4000amperes at 15V average for 0.5s or say 30,
000 joules. Very low efficiency - but here I must add that my mathematical modelling shows that as the current magnitude rises, the efficiency figures improve drastically. When we have say one million amperes, the efficiency goes up to over 80% - but
this is a complicated story that I have shown in one of my 2017 youtube videos relating to the design of space motors using this principle. I would be happy to elaborate the formula relating to railgun motor efficiency in a suitable environment, if
indeed there could be found some worthy sponsors. (I have actually given the key formulas in my 2017 videos, but it will require a trained mind to follow them.)
So as such this is very inefficient, but let us stretch our imagination a bit. Let us say our capacitors have unlimited energy! In free space, they can repeat the hits ten billion times! Then the speed of the motor would be ten billion times 0.2 meters/
sec or 2 billion meters per second or over six times the speed of light! The energy for that spent would be ten billion times 30,000 joules or 3*10^14 joules! But what about the kinetic energy of the motor now? It would be 0.5*11.7*(10^10*0.2)^2 = 5.85*.
04*10^20=2.34*10^19 joules - much more than the 3*10^14 joules spent! The law of conservation does not work in this case, when with internal forces the so far sacred law of inertia is violated. With that gone, the laws of thermodynamics need urgent
revision - the notion of entropy becomes unnecessary as we no longer deal with obsolete heat engines; and the notions of relativity and quantum theory are simply ridiculous.
The above exemplifies the implementation of the formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) which I had discovered in 1998, and elaborated in 1999 in my book "To the Stars!" published in Jan 2000 in my "adda" website. (Now defunct, but not before international publicity was
given to the work, thanks to my late father and his journalist friends, in the global media in 2003.) Since 2003. I have sensed there has been a terrific international conspiracy to suppress this new and challenging work, mainly by personal and
professional attacks upon myself; but with the blessings of the Gods and Goddesses, representing the best of spirits in the spiritual world, I have persevered and carried on the work to this level.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=7545901418770923&set=pcb.7546155095412222

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)