• How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 10:37:34 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024


    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.


    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"


    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"


    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"










    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 10:25:29 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024



    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0



    Paul Kagame is the MAN!


    (read about his opponents)


    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!



    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0




    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!



    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.


    he no need no stinky usb stick.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 10:49:52 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    It is very 'clear'
    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    just pretend
    the voters
    have a choice...
    and make sure
    the opposition
    cannot win.



    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 11:32:09 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Instead of Paul Kagame stuffing ballot boxes, he stuffs voters into the
    ground!








    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 13:29:28 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??


    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.


    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.


    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.


    election delayed is election denied.



    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!


    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.


    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker



    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.



    It is a..coup d'etat.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 11 23:22:58 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:


    Bamboo ballots! Magic thermostats! Ballots from NoKo
    coming in to a port in Maine! HUGO CHAVEZ!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 13 14:51:50 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Governor Swill wrote:


    YOU Governor Swill seem to be evadeing 'term limits'. HOW LONG ARE YOU
    GOING TO BE FUCKING GOVERNOR????

    Let's hear your convoluted legal arguments why you still Governor!!!


    It's more like...Dictator Swill now. (got a swill head filled with
    water)


    no one is above the law...

    counterfeit democracy.














    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Jan 13 15:07:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Governor Swill wrote:

    YOU Governor Swill seem to be evadeing 'term limits'. HOW LONG ARE YOU
    GOING TO BE FUCKING GOVERNOR????

    Let's hear your convoluted legal arguments why you still Governor!!!

    It's more like...Dictator Swill now. (got a swill head filled with
    water)

    no one is above the law...

    counterfeit democracy.


    i don't even recall you've being on any ballot!

    We gonna to have to do a little ...electoral manipulation!



    Open the window, THROW DIS MOTHERFUCKER OUT!



    dats what i call.. a decisive vote.


    appeal dat!


    ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
    there goes his swell head!


    next time, Alasaka Airlines.


    dress warm.




    oops, looks like another door fell open...










    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jan 17 10:20:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of positive government news or policy announcements close to the election to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 18 10:44:01 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024


    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.


    (rig the election before the election)

    It looks like the Democrats already
    tried to throw him out the window judging
    by the cuts on donald trumps hands...

    If, if..they assassinate Donald Trump
    before the election...that's called,

    Pre-Election Rigging.


    Biden can win the election
    even if he is dead with a simple
    USB stick.


    You stick a USB stick in a
    Dominion Voting Machine and
    you can add 50 million votes.


    In Russia,
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024 is
    also being done by planting
    Fake Opponents.


    But I like Putin's idea
    of simply killing them!

    It ...efficient.


    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...


    I don't understand..
    Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi simly take a
    knife and stab him to death while he's on
    tour???

    She's above the law.

    Nobody is going to arrest her.

    She can claim insanity...

    like that First U.S. politian congreessman ever to
    commit murder and got away with it.


    Nancy Pelosi looks at
    Donald Trumps hands and all
    she sees is...Blood.


    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...


    yum, yum, yummmmmmmmmmmm!




    The Starmaker wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.

    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w

    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!

    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!

    election-rigging at it's best!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marty@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 18 19:35:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024

    Inmate Trump is going to be bent over and assfucked in his prison shower.

    That's how to do elections.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jan 18 22:34:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024


    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    Bamboo ballots! Magic thermostats! Ballots from NoKo
    coming in to a port in Maine! HUGO CHAVEZ!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Jan 19 09:40:31 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I just noticed today that
    the Democracts have
    already begun implementing
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024,
    by claiming "aging ballot scanners".

    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.






    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    Politics
    Potential problems with New Hampshires aging ballot scanners https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    If its a sunny, beautiful day, were in great shape, Zink said.


    Guilford said. It has happened before, when hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

    I dont foresee any issues, she said.




    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024"
    Subtitled: Pre-Election Rigging 2024
    author -The Starmaker



    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.


    if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of "technical reasons"..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    List all Your "technical reasons":

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine?
    snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner?

    (Democracts are Now sitting around a table with
    all the "technical reasons" they can come up with)

    (Maybe ChatGPT can come up with some!!!!")
    AI interfering with the election process.



    election delayed is election denied.



    (Nancy Pelosi is not moving from the 6th floor!)

    Nancy Pelosi knows a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    /?'fektiv/
    adjective

    successful in producing a desired or intended result.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024

    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    (rig the election before the election)

    It looks like the Democrats already
    tried to throw him out the window judging
    by the cuts on donald trumps hands...

    If, if..they assassinate Donald Trump
    before the election...that's called,

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    Biden can win the election
    even if he is dead with a simple
    USB stick.

    You stick a USB stick in a
    Dominion Voting Machine and
    you can add 50 million votes.

    In Russia,
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024 is
    also being done by planting
    Fake Opponents.

    But I like Putin's idea
    of simply killing them!

    It ...efficient.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    I don't understand..
    Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi simly take a
    knife and stab him to death while he's on
    tour???

    She's above the law.

    Nobody is going to arrest her.

    She can claim insanity...

    like that First U.S. politian congreessman ever to
    commit murder and got away with it.

    Nancy Pelosi looks at
    Donald Trumps hands and all
    she sees is...Blood.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    yum, yum, yummmmmmmmmmmm!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.

    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w

    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!

    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!

    election-rigging at it's best!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Jan 19 11:52:55 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    How To 'Gum Up' the Election 2024


    use hand sanitizers



    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead






    (for bulk orders contact us for availability!)

    "Hey! I just got an order for 50,000 gallons hand sanitizers??? wats up????"


    "Must be an election coming up..."


    Gum It Up!
    Gum It Up!
    Gum It Up!


    Powerful forces seek to gum up the machinery... Kyle Smith, National Review, 3 Mar. 2022

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gum%20up%20%28something%29



    "Are you the night janitor here?"

    "Yes Sur, Boss!"


    "I need you to make sure these ballot machines are kept clean...use these hand sanitizers only"


    "Yes Sur, Boss! Must be an election coming up..."



    ummm huh
    yo yo wats up?

    "I gotta clean these fuckin Whitey machines...there's an election coming up!"






    The Starmaker wrote:

    I just noticed today that
    the Democracts have
    already begun implementing
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024,
    by claiming "aging ballot scanners".

    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.

    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead

    Politics
    Potential problems with New Hampshires aging ballot scanners https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead

    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    If its a sunny, beautiful day, were in great shape, Zink said.

    Guilford said. It has happened before, when hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

    I dont foresee any issues, she said.

    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024"
    Subtitled: Pre-Election Rigging 2024
    author -The Starmaker

    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

    if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of "technical reasons"..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    List all Your "technical reasons":

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine?
    snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner?

    (Democracts are Now sitting around a table with
    all the "technical reasons" they can come up with)

    (Maybe ChatGPT can come up with some!!!!")
    AI interfering with the election process.

    election delayed is election denied.

    (Nancy Pelosi is not moving from the 6th floor!)

    Nancy Pelosi knows a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    /?'fektiv/
    adjective

    successful in producing a desired or intended result.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024

    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    (rig the election before the election)

    It looks like the Democrats already
    tried to throw him out the window judging
    by the cuts on donald trumps hands...

    If, if..they assassinate Donald Trump
    before the election...that's called,

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    Biden can win the election
    even if he is dead with a simple
    USB stick.

    You stick a USB stick in a
    Dominion Voting Machine and
    you can add 50 million votes.

    In Russia,
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024 is
    also being done by planting
    Fake Opponents.

    But I like Putin's idea
    of simply killing them!

    It ...efficient.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    I don't understand..
    Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi simly take a
    knife and stab him to death while he's on
    tour???

    She's above the law.

    Nobody is going to arrest her.

    She can claim insanity...

    like that First U.S. politian congreessman ever to
    commit murder and got away with it.

    Nancy Pelosi looks at
    Donald Trumps hands and all
    she sees is...Blood.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    yum, yum, yummmmmmmmmmmm!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.

    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w

    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!

    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!

    election-rigging at it's best!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the presence of international election observers to create a false appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Wed Jan 24 12:31:01 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    By now the democrats see Trump is winning everywhere!

    I'm sure they are working on Plan B thru Plan Z on getting rid of
    Trump.

    Either they are going to throw him out the window, or

    simply near the 2024 election simply...

    Cancel the election! (for technical reasons)

    Maybe the year after that, or maybe the year after that, or
    maybe the year after dat they'll run it again.


    Yous are not going to do anything about it, right?

    protest for the next 4 years?












    On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:40:31 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    I just noticed today that
    the Democracts have
    already begun implementing
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024,
    by claiming "aging ballot scanners".

    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.






    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    Politics
    Potential problems with New Hampshires aging ballot scanners >https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    If its a sunny, beautiful day, were in great shape, Zink said.


    Guilford said. It has happened before, when hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

    I dont foresee any issues, she said.




    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024"
    Subtitled: Pre-Election Rigging 2024
    author -The Starmaker



    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.


    if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of "technical reasons"..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    List all Your "technical reasons":

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine?
    snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner?

    (Democracts are Now sitting around a table with
    all the "technical reasons" they can come up with)

    (Maybe ChatGPT can come up with some!!!!")
    AI interfering with the election process.



    election delayed is election denied.



    (Nancy Pelosi is not moving from the 6th floor!)

    Nancy Pelosi knows a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    /?'fektiv/
    adjective

    successful in producing a desired or intended result.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024

    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    (rig the election before the election)

    It looks like the Democrats already
    tried to throw him out the window judging
    by the cuts on donald trumps hands...

    If, if..they assassinate Donald Trump
    before the election...that's called,

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    Biden can win the election
    even if he is dead with a simple
    USB stick.

    You stick a USB stick in a
    Dominion Voting Machine and
    you can add 50 million votes.

    In Russia,
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024 is
    also being done by planting
    Fake Opponents.

    But I like Putin's idea
    of simply killing them!

    It ...efficient.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    I don't understand..
    Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi simly take a
    knife and stab him to death while he's on
    tour???

    She's above the law.

    Nobody is going to arrest her.

    She can claim insanity...

    like that First U.S. politian congreessman ever to
    commit murder and got away with it.

    Nancy Pelosi looks at
    Donald Trumps hands and all
    she sees is...Blood.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    yum, yum, yummmmmmmmmmmm!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.

    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w

    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!

    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!

    election-rigging at it's best!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >> > > >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > > > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >> > > > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >> > > > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > > > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > > > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > > > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >> > > > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > > > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > > > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > > > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > > > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > > > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > > > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >> > > > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > > > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >> > > > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >> > > > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >> > > > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > > > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >> > > > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > > > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > > > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Mon Jan 29 16:54:58 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Do you smell that????


    It smells like...The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.


    https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/29/business/oan-smartmatic-election-lawsuit/index.html



    spreadsheets with passwords????


    The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.



    Cancel the election! (for technical reasons)...whatever they feel
    like coming up with...








    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:31:01 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    By now the democrats see Trump is winning everywhere!

    I'm sure they are working on Plan B thru Plan Z on getting rid of
    Trump.

    Either they are going to throw him out the window, or

    simply near the 2024 election simply...

    Cancel the election! (for technical reasons)

    Maybe the year after that, or maybe the year after that, or
    maybe the year after dat they'll run it again.


    Yous are not going to do anything about it, right?

    protest for the next 4 years?












    On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:40:31 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    I just noticed today that
    the Democracts have
    already begun implementing
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024,
    by claiming "aging ballot scanners".
    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    The plan is to cancel the 2024 election.





    https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    Politics
    Potential problems with New Hampshires aging ballot scanners >>https://apnews.com/article/election-2024-new-hampshire-voting-ballots-cc340208015853deb16a3b307ce3aead


    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    If its a sunny, beautiful day, were in great shape, Zink said.


    Guilford said. It has happened before, when hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.

    I dont foresee any issues, she said.




    BE PREPARED! If Trump gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024"
    Subtitled: Pre-Election Rigging 2024
    author -The Starmaker



    One potential glitch: If its snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner.

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine in 2020 during the pandemic.


    if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of "technical reasons"..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    List all Your "technical reasons":

    hand sanitizer gummed up a machine?
    snowy or rainy, damp ballots can mess up a ballot scanner?

    (Democracts are Now sitting around a table with
    all the "technical reasons" they can come up with)

    (Maybe ChatGPT can come up with some!!!!")
    AI interfering with the election process.



    election delayed is election denied.



    (Nancy Pelosi is not moving from the 6th floor!)

    Nancy Pelosi knows a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    /?'fektiv/
    adjective

    successful in producing a desired or intended result.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    What you are witnessing with
    Donald Trump being dragged
    tied to the pickup truck
    of the legal system...
    is Election Rigging 2024

    or, more precisely...

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    (rig the election before the election)

    It looks like the Democrats already
    tried to throw him out the window judging
    by the cuts on donald trumps hands...

    If, if..they assassinate Donald Trump
    before the election...that's called,

    Pre-Election Rigging.

    Biden can win the election
    even if he is dead with a simple
    USB stick.

    You stick a USB stick in a
    Dominion Voting Machine and
    you can add 50 million votes.

    In Russia,
    Pre-Election Rigging 2024 is
    also being done by planting
    Fake Opponents.

    But I like Putin's idea
    of simply killing them!

    It ...efficient.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    I don't understand..
    Why doesn't Nancy Pelosi simly take a
    knife and stab him to death while he's on
    tour???

    She's above the law.

    Nobody is going to arrest her.

    She can claim insanity...

    like that First U.S. politian congreessman ever to
    commit murder and got away with it.

    Nancy Pelosi looks at
    Donald Trumps hands and all
    she sees is...Blood.

    It makes Nancy Pelosi mouth watery...

    yum, yum, yummmmmmmmmmmm!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.

    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w

    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!

    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!

    election-rigging at it's best!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >>> > > >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>> > > > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>> > > > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >>> > > > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>> > > > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >>> > > > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>> > > > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>> > > > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >>> > > > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>> > > > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>> > > > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>> > > > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>> > > > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>> > > > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >>> > > > > >
    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>> > > > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>> > > > > > presence of international election observers to create a false >>> > > > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jan 30 22:46:24 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Do you smell that????


    It smells like...

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Wed May 22 09:47:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The plan so far is...

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Claims The Biden DOJ and FBI Were Planning to Assassinate Trump
    May 21st, 2024, 7:48 pm

    https://www.mediaite.com/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-claims-the-biden-doj-and-fbi-were-planning-to-assassinate-trump-what-are-republicans-going-to-do-about-it/



    i thought they were planning to cancel the election in
    November.....they are planning to cancel Trump, period.


    Trump should stay away from helicopters...no telling what climate
    change can do to a helicopter.


    I can smellllllll election interference.


    or How To Rig an Election in 2024? DOJ and FBI Were Planning to
    Assassinate...

    In other words, a bullet is a decisive vote.



    A bullet has the power of deciding who doesn't run for President.









    On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:49:52 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    It is very 'clear'
    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    just pretend
    the voters
    have a choice...
    and make sure
    the opposition
    cannot win.



    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >> > >
    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics >> > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting >> > > polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >> > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >> > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >> > > candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >> > > based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors >> > > in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >> > > online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public >> > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of >> > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >> > > to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of >> > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key >> > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >> > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >> > >
    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or >> > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >> > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >> > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >> > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >> > > public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >> > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on >> > > the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >> > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >> > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >> > >
    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster >> > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >> > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >> > > issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >> > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >> > > systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >> > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >> > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific >> > > demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout >> > > in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >> > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle >> > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to >> > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >> > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >> > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >> > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >> > > to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >> > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence >> > > voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >> > > strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >> > > using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >> > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri May 24 10:33:08 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Bradley Kaszs wrote:
    are now
    about to steal another country,

    You don't seem to understand the Real world...

    if I want
    I can steal
    any country
    I want.

    You pick
    any country and
    I can steal it, it
    belongs to me...
    there are no rules
    there are no laws.

    I take it
    It's mine
    it belongs to me.

    They were created
    in my image.


    Of course there are a few countries I
    wouldn't bother to take over..

    China for example. EVERYBODYS GOTS SLANTED EYES!
    I would have to exterminate them all.
    I simply could not have that.

    Russia? EVERYBODY IS A FUNKING COMMIE!!!

    I would have to exterminate them all.

    One commie is one to many.

    I need to steal a country that doesn't
    have too many...pest. You know, unwanted people.
    People who are a problem.

    I just put them in a train and
    gas them all.

    And I'll make a law..
    The right of prima nocta.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jun 13 22:46:44 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Thu Jun 13 21:20:02 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of >> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >> > > > candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >> > > > to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >> > > > fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >> > > >
    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >> > > > issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >> > > > systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >> > > > to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >> > > > gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >> > > > using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Jun 15 13:39:47 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats
    a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of
    town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and
    either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or
    illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to
    vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons,
    but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for
    a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot
    petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a
    candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a
    phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live
    and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the
    central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly,
    disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto
    vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!



    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.


    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the
    election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?


    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?




    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >> > > >
    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >> > > > there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >> > > > principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >> > > > party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >> > > > field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >> > > > manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >> > > >
    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >> > > > gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 16 15:03:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    One method that Donald Trump is using to get ahead of Democracts

    is to...


    Trump campaign launches effort to promote early voting

    Donald Trump Is Now an Early Voting and Vote-By-Mail Evangelist

    Trump pushes early and mail-in voting initiative ahead of November ...

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=trump+vote+early



    Dominion voting machines owners will exclaim ..."HEY, I HAVEN'T RIGGED
    THE VOTING MACHINES YET!!!!"



    Early Voting can bypass the rigging process..


    most of the early votes will be in by a bigger percentage than by voting
    on election day.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats
    a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of
    town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or
    illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons,
    but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for
    a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot
    petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a
    candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a
    phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live
    and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the
    central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly,
    disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto
    vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!

    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.

    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the
    election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?

    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >> >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >> > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >> > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 16 16:07:21 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, the Democrats are following the 'playbook'

    written by Maduro of Venezuela...

    anybody gots a copy of the 'playbook'????


    It's all there. Everything Maduro of Venezuela playbook on

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" are the exact steps

    the Democrats are taking now to date.


    But, but, where can I get a copy of it????

    ChatGPT and all his cousins 'don't even want to talk about it'.


    I can get bits and pieces here and there...but I need the whole 'playbook' intact that the Democrats got from Maduro of Venezuela.



    "How To Rig a AMERICA Election in 2024" (south America, central America, latin America,
    north America, united states of America, Ameri-kay, etc,)



    Maduro of Venezuela playbook --

    1)lawfare


    2)


    3)




    (i'll fill in later)







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats
    a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of
    town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or
    illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons,
    but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for
    a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot
    petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a
    candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a
    phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live
    and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the
    central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly,
    disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto
    vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!

    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.

    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the
    election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?

    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >> >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >> > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >> > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 16 22:07:15 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    One method that Donald Trump is using to get ahead of Democracts

    is to...


    Trump campaign launches effort to promote early voting

    Donald Trump Is Now an Early Voting and Vote-By-Mail Evangelist

    Trump pushes early and mail-in voting initiative ahead of November ...

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=trump+vote+early



    Dominion voting machines owners will exclaim ..."HEY, I HAVEN'T RIGGED
    THE VOTING MACHINES YET!!!!"



    Early Voting can bypass the rigging process..
    most of the early votes will be in by a bigger percentage than by voting
    on election day.

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 16 22:12:10 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Of course, the Democrats are following the 'playbook'

    written by Maduro of Venezuela...

    anybody gots a copy of the 'playbook'????


    It's all there. Everything Maduro of Venezuela playbook on

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" are the exact steps
    the Democrats are taking now to date.

    But, but, where can I get a copy of it????

    ChatGPT and all his cousins 'don't even want to talk about it'.


    I can get bits and pieces here and there...but I need the whole 'playbook' intact that the Democrats got from Maduro of Venezuela.

    "How To Rig a AMERICA Election in 2024" (south America, central America, latin America,
    north America, united states of America, Ameri-kay, etc,)


    Maduro of Venezuela playbook --

    1)lawfare


    2)


    3)

    (i'll fill in later)

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    Voter data expert hired by Trump campaign says 2020 election was not
    stolen

    https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4385239-voter-data-expert-trump- campaign-2020-election-not-stolen/

    Ken Block, whom the Trump campaign hired
    in 2020 to find voter fraud in the
    election, penned an op-ed Tuesday stating
    unequivocally that the 2020 presidential
    election was not stolen and that there
    was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient
    to change the outcome of the election.

    “Can a steady diet of lies and innuendo
    overcome the truth?” the USA Today op-ed
    began. “In November 2020, former President
    Donald Trump asserted that voter fraud had
    altered the outcome of the 2020 presidential
    election. The day after the election, his
    campaign hired an expert in voter data to
    attempt to prove Trump’s allegations and put
    him back in the White House.”

    “I am the expert who was hired by the Trump
    campaign,” Block wrote.

    Block, who owns Simpatico Software Systems,
    said his company’s findings were communicated
    directly to then-White House chief of staff
    Mark Meadows, and transcripts of depositions
    taken by the Jan. 6 select committee
    investigating the attack on the Capitol “show
    that the campaign found no evidence of voter
    fraud sufficient to change the outcome of any
    election.”

    “If voter fraud had impacted the 2020 election,
    it would already have been proven. Maintaining
    the lies undermines faith in the foundation of
    our democracy,” Block wrote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jun 16 22:37:37 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Democracts Playbook: Strategies and Scenarios for Democrats Political
    Survival

    Objective: Outline the strategies employed by President Nicols Maduro
    to maintain political power in Venezuela, and anticipate potential
    scenarios and responses.

    1. Election Postponement

    Strategy:

    Objective: Undermine opposition and gain time to mitigate negative
    public opinion.
    Execution: Postpone elections as necessary.
    Rationale: Creates a buffer period to weaken opposition parties and
    prevent immediate electoral challenges.

    Implementation Steps:

    Identify and leverage legal or procedural grounds to justify
    postponements.
    Control media narrative to justify postponements as necessary for
    national stability.
    Utilize state resources to maintain public support during the delay.

    2. Election Manipulation

    Strategy:

    Objective: Secure electoral victory by undermining opposition participation.
    Execution: Manipulate results, especially in isolated locations
    lacking opposition poll watchers.
    Rationale: Reduces the likelihood of organized opposition, ensuring favorable outcomes.

    Implementation Steps:

    Deploy loyal officials to manage polling sites in remote areas.
    Restrict opposition access to poll monitoring.
    Utilize state media to announce favorable results promptly.

    3. Emulating the Nicaraguan Model

    Strategy:

    Objective: Eliminate credible opposition through legal and
    extralegal means.
    Execution: Ban and jail opposition candidates, akin to President
    Daniel Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo's tactics in Nicaragua.
    Rationale: Removes potential threats and consolidates power.

    Implementation Steps:

    Introduce and enforce laws that disqualify opposition candidates on technical grounds.
    Use security forces to arrest and detain opposition leaders under
    pretexts of national security.
    Control judiciary to support these actions.

    4. Invalidating Elections

    Strategy:

    Objective: Secure victory by discrediting or annulling unfavorable
    election results.
    Execution: Steal or invalidate the election.
    Rationale: Prevents opposition from gaining power, albeit with high personal risk.

    Implementation Steps:

    Prepare legal challenges to election results in advance.
    Mobilize loyalists to create and spread allegations of fraud against opposition.
    Deploy security forces to suppress protests and dissent.

    5. Managing Defeat

    Scenario:

    Event: Opposition wins decisively despite manipulative tactics.
    Challenge: Disregarding the election outcome without losing control.

    Response Steps:

    Use legal mechanisms ("lawfare") to disqualify the victorious
    opposition.
    Deploy security forces to manage and disperse protests.
    Control media narrative to delegitimize opposition victory.
    Seek international allies to support the regime's stance and prevent external intervention.

    Risk Mitigation:

    Monitoring and Surveillance: Maintain constant surveillance on
    opposition activities.
    Intelligence Operations: Gather and act on intelligence to pre-empt opposition moves.
    International Relations: Secure support from international allies to bolster legitimacy and counteract foreign pressures.

    Conclusion: By understanding and implementing these strategies, the
    regime can maintain a firm grip on power despite internal and external challenges. Each strategy must be tailored to the evolving political
    landscape and opposition tactics, ensuring a flexible yet resolute
    approach to political survival.




    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, the Democrats are following the 'playbook'

    written by Maduro of Venezuela...

    anybody gots a copy of the 'playbook'????

    It's all there. Everything Maduro of Venezuela playbook on

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" are the exact steps

    the Democrats are taking now to date.

    But, but, where can I get a copy of it????

    ChatGPT and all his cousins 'don't even want to talk about it'.

    I can get bits and pieces here and there...but I need the whole 'playbook' intact that the Democrats got from Maduro of Venezuela.

    "How To Rig a AMERICA Election in 2024" (south America, central America, latin America,
    north America, united states of America, Ameri-kay, etc,)

    Maduro of Venezuela playbook --

    1)lawfare

    2)

    3)

    (i'll fill in later)

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats
    a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of
    town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons, but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for
    a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot
    petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a
    phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live
    and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly,
    disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto
    vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!

    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.

    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the
    election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?

    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >> > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >> > > >
    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false >> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jun 17 13:17:34 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, I prefer Putin's Playbook...he's gots no political
    opponents...THEY ARE ALL FUCKIN DEAD!!!!



    The Starmaker wrote:

    Democracts Playbook: Strategies and Scenarios for Democrats Political Survival

    Objective: Outline the strategies employed by President Nicols Maduro
    to maintain political power in Venezuela, and anticipate potential
    scenarios and responses.

    1. Election Postponement

    Strategy:

    Objective: Undermine opposition and gain time to mitigate negative
    public opinion.
    Execution: Postpone elections as necessary.
    Rationale: Creates a buffer period to weaken opposition parties and prevent immediate electoral challenges.

    Implementation Steps:

    Identify and leverage legal or procedural grounds to justify postponements.
    Control media narrative to justify postponements as necessary for national stability.
    Utilize state resources to maintain public support during the delay.

    2. Election Manipulation

    Strategy:

    Objective: Secure electoral victory by undermining opposition participation.
    Execution: Manipulate results, especially in isolated locations
    lacking opposition poll watchers.
    Rationale: Reduces the likelihood of organized opposition, ensuring favorable outcomes.

    Implementation Steps:

    Deploy loyal officials to manage polling sites in remote areas.
    Restrict opposition access to poll monitoring.
    Utilize state media to announce favorable results promptly.

    3. Emulating the Nicaraguan Model

    Strategy:

    Objective: Eliminate credible opposition through legal and
    extralegal means.
    Execution: Ban and jail opposition candidates, akin to President
    Daniel Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo's tactics in Nicaragua.
    Rationale: Removes potential threats and consolidates power.

    Implementation Steps:

    Introduce and enforce laws that disqualify opposition candidates on technical grounds.
    Use security forces to arrest and detain opposition leaders under pretexts of national security.
    Control judiciary to support these actions.

    4. Invalidating Elections

    Strategy:

    Objective: Secure victory by discrediting or annulling unfavorable election results.
    Execution: Steal or invalidate the election.
    Rationale: Prevents opposition from gaining power, albeit with high personal risk.

    Implementation Steps:

    Prepare legal challenges to election results in advance.
    Mobilize loyalists to create and spread allegations of fraud against opposition.
    Deploy security forces to suppress protests and dissent.

    5. Managing Defeat

    Scenario:

    Event: Opposition wins decisively despite manipulative tactics.
    Challenge: Disregarding the election outcome without losing control.

    Response Steps:

    Use legal mechanisms ("lawfare") to disqualify the victorious
    opposition.
    Deploy security forces to manage and disperse protests.
    Control media narrative to delegitimize opposition victory.
    Seek international allies to support the regime's stance and prevent external intervention.

    Risk Mitigation:

    Monitoring and Surveillance: Maintain constant surveillance on
    opposition activities.
    Intelligence Operations: Gather and act on intelligence to pre-empt opposition moves.
    International Relations: Secure support from international allies to bolster legitimacy and counteract foreign pressures.

    Conclusion: By understanding and implementing these strategies, the
    regime can maintain a firm grip on power despite internal and external challenges. Each strategy must be tailored to the evolving political landscape and opposition tactics, ensuring a flexible yet resolute
    approach to political survival.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, the Democrats are following the 'playbook'

    written by Maduro of Venezuela...

    anybody gots a copy of the 'playbook'????

    It's all there. Everything Maduro of Venezuela playbook on

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" are the exact steps

    the Democrats are taking now to date.

    But, but, where can I get a copy of it????

    ChatGPT and all his cousins 'don't even want to talk about it'.

    I can get bits and pieces here and there...but I need the whole 'playbook' intact that the Democrats got from Maduro of Venezuela.

    "How To Rig a AMERICA Election in 2024" (south America, central America, latin America,
    north America, united states of America, Ameri-kay, etc,)

    Maduro of Venezuela playbook --

    1)lawfare

    2)

    3)

    (i'll fill in later)

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons, but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly, disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!

    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.

    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?

    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up >> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >> > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters. >> > > >
    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false >> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jun 25 10:08:40 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to
    manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to
    add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2
    million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that
    someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    Oh, I thought of one more option the Democrats have that will work...

    all they have to do is..

    Do a major, do a MAJOR

    DO A MAJOR, MAJOR ELECTION RIGGING!!!

    Bring out th Gig Guns!

    Major stuffing ballots fraud
    Major rigging of all voting machines
    Major hire only people with dyslexia to do the hand counting
    (and i put ballot boxes in neighborhoods that are darker than blue) dats
    a new one i just made up!
    any whities dat want to use the drop box gotta go the dark side of
    town....
    (slap me on the nigger side!)
    Major Stealing votes
    Start your own Messenger Ballot Stuffer Classes!
    Craig-Callaway will pay you $30.00 messenger ballot, but, but, you
    gotta make three trips to get the $30.00
    Major Major
    Requesting absentee ballots and voting without the knowledge of the
    actual voter; or obtaining the absentee ballot from a voter and either
    filling it in directly and forging the voters signature or
    illegally
    telling the voter who to vote for.
    Ineligible Voting

    Illegal registration and voting by individuals who are not U.S.
    citizens, are convicted felons, or are otherwise not eligible to vote.
    Impersonation Fraud At The Polls

    Voting in the name of other legitimate voters and voters who
    have died,
    moved away, or lost their right to vote because they are felons,
    but
    remain registered.
    Buying Votes

    Paying voters to cast either an in-person or absentee ballot for
    a
    particular candidate.
    Ballot Petition Fraud

    Forging the signatures of registered voters on the ballot
    petitions that
    must be filed with election officials in some states for a
    candidate or
    issue to be listed on the official ballot
    Duplicate Voting

    Registering in multiple locations and voting in the same
    election in
    more than one jurisdiction or state.
    False Registrations

    Voting under fraudulent voter registrations that either use a
    phony name
    and a real or fake address or claim residence in a particular
    jurisdiction where the registered voter does not actually live
    and is
    not entitled to vote.
    Altering The Vote Count

    Changing the actual vote count either in a precinct or at the
    central
    location where votes are counted.
    Illegal "Assistance" At The Polls

    Forcing or intimidating votersparticularly the elderly,
    disabled,
    illiterate, and those for whom English is a second languageto
    vote for
    particular candidates while supposedly providing them with assistance.


    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are... 1.8 million voters!!!

    Now, Donald Trump will be 'monitoring' the election stations...

    if he complains of just 'one' vote rigging fraud...CANCEL THE ELECTION!

    It will take ten years to do a recount.

    Either way they got him.

    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democrats will cancel the
    election? or cancel him??

    Civil War?

    no matter what it's going to be fun, won't it?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????

    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.

    I don't see any at all.

    do you?

    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >> >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >> > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >> > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jun 25 10:24:31 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to
    add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2
    million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.



    Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like:

    Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook

    Objective:

    To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
    process.

    Actors:

    Political Party (Democrats)
    Voting Machine Manufacturer

    Timeline & Actions:

    Preparation Phase
    Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
    Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent
    votes using a USB stick.
    Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
    to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.

    Election Day
    Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time
    vote counts.
    Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with
    the targeted voting machines.

    Execution Phase
    Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
    Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
    Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
    leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.

    Post-Election Audit
    Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election
    results.
    Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes
    for Trump.
    Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the
    voting machines.
    Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to
    match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.

    Disruption Phase
    Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify
    claims of tampering.
    Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
    outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
    Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the
    election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.

    Aftermath
    Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
    investigation into the tampering claims.
    Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
    ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
    Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and
    political fallout.

    Contingency Plans:

    Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
    whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
    Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any
    public backlash and maintain credibility.
    Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
    any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent
    claims.

    Conclusion:

    By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the
    election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately
    disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
    cancellation.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chip Roy@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 25 17:36:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to >manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to
    add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2
    million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that >someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.



    I watch OAN all day and this is how it's going to go down:

    Biden's an evil genius who is probably using black magic to win the election because he alone controls all voting machines from his lair located in the
    old bowling alley in the White House basement. Meanwhile Trump, a very stable genius, has proactively called the election a fraud even before the first vote is cast and is urging his followers to repeat Jan 6 and descend on the Capitol Building and demand Trump's immediate installation as POTUS for life, but it must not be done during Mon, Jul 15, 2024 Thu, Jul 18, 2024 because that's when everybody's getting drunk and settling down with male prostitutes at the big Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. A place he calls a 'Horrible city', probably because he's used all the male hookers there and there are none to be had who don't already know that he's going to screw them for their fee when they fuck him in the ass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jun 25 10:40:28 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, I think it's more fun for the Democrats at the last minute to
    change the polling location in Red states to locations only
    in Black neighborhoods.


    MARTHA, WHERE ARE WE, THIS LOOKS LIKE A WAR ZONE!!!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to
    add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2
    million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.

    Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like:

    Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook

    Objective:

    To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
    process.

    Actors:

    Political Party (Democrats)
    Voting Machine Manufacturer

    Timeline & Actions:

    Preparation Phase
    Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
    Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
    Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
    to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.

    Election Day
    Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time
    vote counts.
    Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with
    the targeted voting machines.

    Execution Phase
    Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
    Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
    Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
    leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.

    Post-Election Audit
    Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election
    results.
    Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes
    for Trump.
    Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the
    voting machines.
    Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to
    match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.

    Disruption Phase
    Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
    Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
    outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
    Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the
    election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.

    Aftermath
    Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
    investigation into the tampering claims.
    Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
    ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
    Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and
    political fallout.

    Contingency Plans:

    Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
    whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
    Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
    Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
    any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent
    claims.

    Conclusion:

    By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
    cancellation.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jun 25 11:34:35 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, on election day

    the voting machine manufacture

    will announce to the American people..

    ' We had provided voting services for the American people since 1776.

    'Even in moments of deep political conflict and division we have been
    satisfied that the voting process and the count has been completely
    accurate in the past.'

    'It is, therefore, with the deepest regret that we have to report that
    the figures on Tuesday, 05 November, for the American people of the
    United States were tampered with.'





    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to
    add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2
    million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.

    Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like:

    Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook

    Objective:

    To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
    process.

    Actors:

    Political Party (Democrats)
    Voting Machine Manufacturer

    Timeline & Actions:

    Preparation Phase
    Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
    Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
    Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
    to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.

    Election Day
    Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time
    vote counts.
    Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with
    the targeted voting machines.

    Execution Phase
    Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
    Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
    Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
    leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.

    Post-Election Audit
    Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election
    results.
    Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes
    for Trump.
    Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the
    voting machines.
    Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to
    match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.

    Disruption Phase
    Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
    Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
    outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
    Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the
    election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.

    Aftermath
    Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
    investigation into the tampering claims.
    Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
    ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
    Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and
    political fallout.

    Contingency Plans:

    Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
    whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
    Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
    Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
    any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent
    claims.

    Conclusion:

    By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
    cancellation.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jun 26 10:31:52 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    It's very simple
    to count
    how many people
    use a polling station
    and how many votes
    there are...
    the numbers should match.

    If they don't match...
    and you got a count
    of an extra 2 million...

    the voting machine it rigged!

    GRAB DA GUY WIT THE USB STICK IN HIS HAND, QUICK, BEFORE HE ERASES
    IT!!!!


    Who is going to monitor polling locations in Black neighborHoods???


    WAT DA FUCK YOU DOIN AROUND HERE WHITEY????

    Instructions: You see a White guy, STEAL THEIR CAR! (while they are
    still in it.)





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, I think it's more fun for the Democrats at the last minute to change the polling location in Red states to locations only
    in Black neighborhoods.

    MARTHA, WHERE ARE WE, THIS LOOKS LIKE A WAR ZONE!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2 million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.

    Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like:

    Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook

    Objective:

    To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
    process.

    Actors:

    Political Party (Democrats)
    Voting Machine Manufacturer

    Timeline & Actions:

    Preparation Phase
    Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
    Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
    Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
    to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.

    Election Day
    Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time vote counts.
    Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with the targeted voting machines.

    Execution Phase
    Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
    Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
    Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
    leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.

    Post-Election Audit
    Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election results.
    Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes for Trump.
    Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the voting machines.
    Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.

    Disruption Phase
    Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
    Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
    outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
    Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.

    Aftermath
    Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
    investigation into the tampering claims.
    Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
    ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
    Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and political fallout.

    Contingency Plans:

    Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
    whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
    Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
    Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
    any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent claims.

    Conclusion:

    By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
    cancellation.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jun 26 11:00:25 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    WAT DA FUCK YOU DOIN AROUND HERE WHITEY????

    Whitey: "I'm a poll watcher!"

    WHO DA FUCK IS WATCHING YOUR CAR, WHITEY???

    AND, WAT DA FUCK YOU DOIN AROUND HERE WHITEY????

    another Whitey: "I'm a pole worker!"

    YOU'RE GONNA BE WORKING MY FUCIN POLE IN A MINUTE YOU
    WHITEYMOTHERFUCKER!!!!


    MARTHA, WHERE ARE WE, THIS LOOKS LIKE A WAR ZONE!!!






    The Starmaker wrote:

    It's very simple
    to count
    how many people
    use a polling station
    and how many votes
    there are...
    the numbers should match.

    If they don't match...
    and you got a count
    of an extra 2 million...

    the voting machine it rigged!

    GRAB DA GUY WIT THE USB STICK IN HIS HAND, QUICK, BEFORE HE ERASES
    IT!!!!

    Who is going to monitor polling locations in Black neighborHoods???

    WAT DA FUCK YOU DOIN AROUND HERE WHITEY????

    Instructions: You see a White guy, STEAL THEIR CAR! (while they are
    still in it.)

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, I think it's more fun for the Democrats at the last minute to change the polling location in Red states to locations only
    in Black neighborhoods.

    MARTHA, WHERE ARE WE, THIS LOOKS LIKE A WAR ZONE!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Here is a Question...

    What if the Democrats and a voting machine manufacturer colluded to manipulate election results by
    rigging the machines near the end of election day using a USB stick to add 2 million fraudulent votes, not for Biden,
    but for Trump? When an audit is conducted, it would show that the 2 million votes were all for Trump.
    The Democrats and the voting machine manufacturer could then claim that someone tampered with the voting machines, citing the
    inability to match the additional 2 million votes as proof, and use this
    as a basis to postpone or cancel the election.

    Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like:

    Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook

    Objective:

    To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election process.

    Actors:

    Political Party (Democrats)
    Voting Machine Manufacturer

    Timeline & Actions:

    Preparation Phase
    Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
    Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
    Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
    to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.

    Election Day
    Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time vote counts.
    Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with the targeted voting machines.

    Execution Phase
    Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
    Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
    Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.

    Post-Election Audit
    Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election results.
    Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes for Trump.
    Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the voting machines.
    Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.

    Disruption Phase
    Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
    Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
    Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.

    Aftermath
    Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent investigation into the tampering claims.
    Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
    Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and political fallout.

    Contingency Plans:

    Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
    Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
    Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent claims.

    Conclusion:

    By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or cancellation.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 2 08:43:14 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now that the Democrats are ...drowning,

    it's time for Donald Trump to

    stick a waterhose down their mouths.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 13 13:06:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    if they don't want Him to run for President...


    if they don't want Hims to run for President...


    if they don't want Trump to run for President

    if they don't want Biden to run for President


    why not just...cancel the election????


    change the election date to...next year.



    isn't dat the plan anyway?




    I mean, you cannot assassinate both of them at the same time??,,,dat
    would look to suspicious.


    it would look like...election interference.





    it would look...Rigged.















    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >>> > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of >>> > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate? >>> > >
    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>> > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts >>> > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters >>> > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular >>> > > candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>> > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting >>> > > based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>> > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation >>> > > online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>> > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>> > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions, >>> > > to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>> > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems >>> > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities. >>> > >
    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or >>> > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>> > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws >>> > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information >>> > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence >>> > > public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate >>> > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes, >>> > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>> > > fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>> > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>> > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt >>> > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>> > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge. >>> > >
    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>> > > election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials >>> > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>> > > impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates, >>> > > issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>> > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting >>> > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting >>> > > systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or >>> > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues >>> > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>> > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage, >>> > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public >>> > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of >>> > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election >>> > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform >>> > > to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent >>> > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>> > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their >>> > > strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>> > > gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially >>> > > using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific >>> > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 18 11:17:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!"
    FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys."
    CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their
    guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Jul 20 07:55:55 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    i guess 'the political community' realized that
    the civil war would not be against
    people against people..but

    20 year olds at war with...'the political community'.


    So, 'the political community' are trying to quite down
    anyone trying to...hit on them.

    'the political community' try to put a target on
    people against people...but
    it's their own back they put a target on.

    'the political community' would claim
    it's the white people who are the enemy
    or, black people. or the slanted eye people, or the jewish people..
    but the 20 year old see
    'the political community' as the enemy of the people.

    It's time for 'the political community' to hide.

    Go on vacation or something...





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!"
    FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 21 16:10:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?


    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    (the White half of him, not the nigger side of him.)






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rodnet@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 21 23:43:49 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    White half of him, not the White half of him.)

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    goes out
    who does in...

    Who goes Obama
    goes out
    who goes Obama
    going..

    Who does in place?

    (the side of him.)

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running to
    make who
    going who goes Obama
    going who goes in place?

    (the shots, right?


    i mean, he calls the side of him, not the side of him.)

    So, I was wondering who goes in...

    since it is Obama
    going to
    make who does Obama
    going who
    going who
    goes Ob

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 22 00:03:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 2024-07-21, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?


    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    (the White half of him, not the nigger side of him.)

    Obama's political career has been mostly walk a middle line, don't make partisan decisions and just
    kind of be there.
    It's the same with the Biden saga.
    He has never actually come out in public suggesting Joe Biden should drop out. Neither have the Clintons.

    That says it all.

    The Clintons taught Obama well.
    Don't make waves.


    --
    pothead
    Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
    Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
    Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to pothead on Sun Jul 21 21:30:09 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    pothead wrote:

    On 2024-07-21, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?


    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    (the White half of him, not the nigger side of him.)

    Obama's political career has been mostly walk a middle line, don't make partisan decisions and just
    kind of be there.
    It's the same with the Biden saga.
    He has never actually come out in public suggesting Joe Biden should drop out.
    Neither have the Clintons.

    That says it all.

    The Clintons taught Obama well.
    Don't make waves.

    The Clintons talk with a southern accent...meaning they see Obama as a
    Black slave.


    When Obama goes to the White House, he talks White..

    when he goes home to the Black House..he talks niggar talk.


    Obama's political career has been mostly walk a middle line...between
    the whities and blackies.

    Is he White or Black?









    --
    pothead
    Joe Biden is the absolute WORST President Of the U.S. ever.
    Nobody else is even close. Including Jimmy Carter.
    Vote for ANYBODY but Joe Biden in 2024.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 22 12:27:38 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, Biden tells everyone..

    "I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO,!"


    and Obama tells Biden..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU WHITE ASS MOHTHERFUCKER!!!!"


    and Biden sez to Obama "EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU'RE A FUCKING FAGGGGGGGG, YOU FUCKING HALF-BREED MUTT ASS NIGGAAAAAAARR!!!!!


    Obama tells him.."YOU'RE A FUCKING DUMBASSS MOTHERFUCKER YOU FCKING WHITE BREAD ASS CRACKER!!!!" HONKY!


    Biden gets mad and tells Obama.."EVERYDODY KNOWS YOU SUCK ELEPHANT DICKS, AND YOUR MOMMA TOO!!!


    Obama tells him, "I'LL THROW YOU DOWN THE STAIRS MOTHERFUCKER!!!"


    this goes on between them for years...














    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?

    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    (the White half of him, not the nigger side of him.)

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 22 17:11:55 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now, everybody wants
    Kamla Harris to be
    President NOW so
    that everyone can
    see beforehand how
    terrible she is...and
    nobody will vote for her...

    not even her Jewish husband.

    (and he doesn't want to make babies with her because she's 'too dark'.)

    he just wants a black slave in bed.

    (wat white guy doesn't)

    yes, Master. or is it Masser?


    Her First Lady.










    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, Biden tells everyone..

    "I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO,!"

    and Obama tells Biden..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU WHITE ASS MOHTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    and Biden sez to Obama "EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU'RE A FUCKING FAGGGGGGGG, YOU FUCKING HALF-BREED MUTT ASS NIGGAAAAAAARR!!!!!

    Obama tells him.."YOU'RE A FUCKING DUMBASSS MOTHERFUCKER YOU FCKING WHITE BREAD ASS CRACKER!!!!" HONKY!

    Biden gets mad and tells Obama.."EVERYDODY KNOWS YOU SUCK ELEPHANT DICKS, AND YOUR MOMMA TOO!!!

    Obama tells him, "I'LL THROW YOU DOWN THE STAIRS MOTHERFUCKER!!!"

    this goes on between them for years...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?

    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    (the White half of him, not the nigger side of him.)

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 22 17:36:58 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, everybody wants
    Kamla Harris to be
    President NOW so
    that everyone can
    see beforehand how
    terrible she is...and
    nobody will vote for her...

    not even her Jewish husband.

    (and he doesn't want to make babies with her because she's 'too dark'.)

    he just wants a black slave in bed.

    (wat white guy doesn't)

    yes, Master. or is it Masser?

    Her First Lady.


    yous certaintly don't want a First Jewish in the Whitehose..

    he'll sell your ass to Israel!


    (all the money to Kamala campaign is from...Israel!)


    you wanna list?

    The List????



    (give me a minute, i need to look for it)






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jul 23 00:22:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, everybody wants
    Kamla Harris to be
    President NOW so
    that everyone can
    see beforehand how
    terrible she is...and
    nobody will vote for her...

    not even her Jewish husband.

    (and he doesn't want to make babies with her because she's 'too dark'.)

    he just wants a black slave in bed.

    (wat white guy doesn't)

    yes, Master. or is it Masser?

    Her First Lady.

    yous certaintly don't want a First Jewish in the Whitehose..

    he'll sell your ass to Israel!

    (all the money to Kamala campaign is from...Israel!)

    you wanna list?

    The List????

    (give me a minute, i need to look for it)

    The List:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EfB2Qlf7sGJxBAKdIDPTjuLAVntv0QBpm6fuRxQSqZo/edit#gid=1010202011



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jul 23 08:40:29 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, everybody wants
    Kamla Harris to be
    President NOW so
    that everyone can
    see beforehand how
    terrible she is...and
    nobody will vote for her...

    not even her Jewish husband.

    (and he doesn't want to make babies with her because she's 'too dark'.)

    he just wants a black slave in bed.

    (wat white guy doesn't)

    yes, Master. or is it Masser?

    Her First Lady.

    yous certaintly don't want a First Jewish in the Whitehose..

    he'll sell your ass to Israel!

    (all the money to Kamala campaign is from...Israel!)

    you wanna list?

    The List????

    (give me a minute, i need to look for it)

    The List:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EfB2Qlf7sGJxBAKdIDPTjuLAVntv0QBpm6fuRxQSqZo/edit#gid=1010202011

    In other words, according to The List..

    if Kakamala is elected President of the United States...it would be

    Kakamala's husband that would dictate U.S. Foreign Policy.


    but some of yous cannot see that far ahead.


    but they are probably having a party now in Israel.


    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is exclaiming..


    "WE GOT A FUCKIN JEWISH GUY IN THE WHITE HOUSE! WE RUN THE WORLD
    NOW!!!!"


    a spy in the whitehouse
    dats no gentlemen.
    a lady without a pussy.

    the first lady without a pussy

    get out the t-shirts!









    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jul 23 21:37:42 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, I have To question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable, ...

    did that guy who took a shot at Trump on the roof a member of the CIA????

    Because if he was a member of the CIA, then that would explain why

    he had...clearance. He was for a lack of a better word...undeterred.


    You know...everybody looking the other way...


    SONNY
    Where the hell was Paulie, why
    wasn't he with the Don?



    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!"
    FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Jul 23 21:44:32 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, I have To question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable, ...

    did that guy who took a shot at Trump on the roof a member of the CIA????

    Because if he was a member of the CIA, then that would explain why

    he had...clearance. He was for a lack of a better word...undeterred.


    You know...everybody looking the other way...


    SONNY
    Where the hell was Paulie, why
    wasn't he with the Don?



    She resign from the CIA because...she knows toooo much.





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!"
    FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jul 25 08:45:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, Biden tells everyone..

    "I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO,!"

    and Obama tells Biden..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU WHITE ASS MOHTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    and Biden sez to Obama "EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU'RE A FUCKING FAGGGGGGGG, YOU FUCKING HALF-BREED MUTT ASS NIGGAAAAAAARR!!!!!

    Obama tells him.."YOU'RE A FUCKING DUMBASSS MOTHERFUCKER YOU FCKING WHITE BREAD ASS CRACKER!!!!" HONKY!

    Biden gets mad and tells Obama.."EVERYDODY KNOWS YOU SUCK ELEPHANT DICKS, AND YOUR MOMMA TOO!!!

    Obama tells him, "I'LL THROW YOU DOWN THE STAIRS MOTHERFUCKER!!!"

    this goes on between them for years...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?

    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    So, has Obama 'endorsed' Kamala Harris...yet?


    I wanna knows who's running.

    Who the coup'deta is picking...


    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jul 25 12:25:29 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    EVERYBODY KNOWS Kamala's husband justs wants a slave in the house to
    take care of his children.

    DO THE FUCKIN DISHES , BITCH!!

    bring me some money...bitch!


    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, everybody wants
    Kamla Harris to be
    President NOW so
    that everyone can
    see beforehand how
    terrible she is...and
    nobody will vote for her...

    not even her Jewish husband.

    (and he doesn't want to make babies with her because she's 'too dark'.)

    he just wants a black slave in bed.

    (wat white guy doesn't)

    yes, Master. or is it Masser?

    Her First Lady.

    yous certaintly don't want a First Jewish in the Whitehose..

    he'll sell your ass to Israel!

    (all the money to Kamala campaign is from...Israel!)

    you wanna list?

    The List????

    (give me a minute, i need to look for it)

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Jul 25 23:29:40 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I don't understand what is all dis talk about 'the shooter's motive'?

    Are these people stupid or something???? The motive is...'election interference'!

    everybodys doing it! all the democrats have the same motive...'election manipulation'.

    a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    successful in producing a desired or intended result.




    The motive is...'election interference...democracy at work.


    All these people going after Trump all have the same motive.


    'election interference'.



    November will be the biggest 'election interference' in history!



    Stay tune to this thread on "How To Rig an Election in 2024".


    (dis thread will last to November 2024)


    dats only a few 30 days from now...



    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I have To question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable, ...

    did that guy who took a shot at Trump on the roof a member of the CIA????

    Because if he was a member of the CIA, then that would explain why

    he had...clearance. He was for a lack of a better word...undeterred.

    You know...everybody looking the other way...

    SONNY
    Where the hell was Paulie, why
    wasn't he with the Don?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!"
    FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Jul 26 20:21:41 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I don't know what to make of this...

    Biden camp suggests president quickly endorsed Kamala Harris to defy Barack Obama


    Published July 26, 2024, 5:39 p.m. ET

    It was Joes big fk you, the source said. Joe said, If Im out, then I am endorsing her.'

    https://nypost.com/2024/07/26/us-news/biden-camp-suggests-prez-quickly-endorsed-harris-to-defy-obama/




    So, who is running the ...show?



    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, Biden tells everyone..

    "I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO, I DON'T WANNA GO,!"

    and Obama tells Biden..."GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE YOU WHITE ASS MOHTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    and Biden sez to Obama "EVERYBODY KNOWS YOU'RE A FUCKING FAGGGGGGGG, YOU FUCKING HALF-BREED MUTT ASS NIGGAAAAAAARR!!!!!

    Obama tells him.."YOU'RE A FUCKING DUMBASSS MOTHERFUCKER YOU FCKING WHITE BREAD ASS CRACKER!!!!" HONKY!

    Biden gets mad and tells Obama.."EVERYDODY KNOWS YOU SUCK ELEPHANT DICKS, AND YOUR MOMMA TOO!!!

    Obama tells him, "I'LL THROW YOU DOWN THE STAIRS MOTHERFUCKER!!!"

    this goes on between them for years...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I was wondering..

    since it is Obama
    running who goes out
    who goes in...

    Who does Obama
    going to
    make who
    goes in place?

    i mean, he calls the shots, right?

    So, has Obama 'endorsed' Kamala Harris...yet?

    I wanna knows who's running.

    Who the coup'deta is picking...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Jul 26 20:28:23 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    btw, the shooter was a scientist studying at a community college...

    Is it ever remotely possible to study science at a ...community
    college?? who teaches there...drug addicts?




    btw, Lee Harvey Oswald was involved with the CIA Before he killed
    Kennedy...


    was this Trump shooter involved with the CIA months before the
    shooting???

    i want the names of all the people who shoots with the shooter...just
    the CIA guys. (not all the other shooters he shot with at that shooting
    range.)



    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't understand what is all dis talk about 'the shooter's motive'?

    Are these people stupid or something???? The motive is...'election interference'!

    everybodys doing it! all the democrats have the same motive...'election manipulation'.

    a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    successful in producing a desired or intended result.

    The motive is...'election interference...democracy at work.

    All these people going after Trump all have the same motive.

    'election interference'.

    November will be the biggest 'election interference' in history!

    Stay tune to this thread on "How To Rig an Election in 2024".

    (dis thread will last to November 2024)

    dats only a few 30 days from now...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I have To question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable, ...

    did that guy who took a shot at Trump on the roof a member of the CIA????

    Because if he was a member of the CIA, then that would explain why

    he had...clearance. He was for a lack of a better word...undeterred.

    You know...everybody looking the other way...

    SONNY
    Where the hell was Paulie, why
    wasn't he with the Don?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!" FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 27 09:36:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...


    How To Rig an Election in 2024



    (all you need is one USB stick)



    One
    usb
    stick.


    Just
    one.


    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!


    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.


    but the vote was flipped.


    A fake screen!


    pishing!


    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!



    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.


    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)


    Learn grasshopper, learn.



    How To Rig an Election in 2024



    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.



    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)



    How To Rig an Election in 2024




    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.


    (the whole democrats world are watching)


    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?


    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.


    It's a playbook.



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Jul 27 21:57:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Do yous people actually believe that the Democrats would 'permit' Donald
    Trump to win the election????


    Naive.



    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 28 15:03:25 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law


    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to
    never lose an election.



    I WANT ONE!!!!



    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From x@21:1/5 to Lil dwarf Rudey on Sun Jul 28 13:41:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 7/27/24 13:35, Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
    Governor Swill wrote:
    Which is perfect!


    Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A Terrell and
    a dozen other socks wrote:

    Multiple death threats against Trump: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.
    highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
    Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
    Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
    Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
    References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
    <ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Lines: 55
    X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
    Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
    X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
    otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
    Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

    Oh poor me I got shot at ...

    Swill ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-
    media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
    Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
    Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
    Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
    References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
    X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Lines: 31
    X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
    Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
    X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
    otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
    Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400


    Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

    Swill

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
    Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
     Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
    Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
    Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
    Lines: 25
    Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
    References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
     <moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com> <v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
     <v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
     <tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com> <v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
     <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
    Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
        logging-data="1795977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
    User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
    Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
    Content-Language: en-US
    In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
    Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549 alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

    No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
    thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
    is an important step to getting there.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:


    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
    18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the Presidency
    U.S. Code
    Notes
    prev | next
    (a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
    or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
    letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
    threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
    the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
    President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
    of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
    knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
    order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
    or both.
    (b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
    respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
    held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
    accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
    phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
    order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
    United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
    (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L. 97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

    9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
    Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret Service Protectees
    The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
    caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
    the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
    U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
    United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
    involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
    settlement involving a § 871 charge.


    https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

    PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
    Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
    counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
    and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

    The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
    living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
    to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
    November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
    statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

    Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
    Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
    up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
    of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
    five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release.

    A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
    criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
    presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

    The United States Secret Service is conducting the investigation in this case. The United States Attorney’s Office, District of Arizona, is
    handling the prosecution.


    Those can be reported here:

    https://tips.fbi.gov/home

    https://www.justice.gov/action-center/report-crime-or-submit-complaint

    https://www.secretservice.gov/contact

    https://www.dhs.gov/see-something-say-something/reporting/california


    Fellow citizens, won't you join in ending Rudey's terrorism here?

    I should remind you that the OFFICE of President of the United
    States, murdered tens of thousands of civilians and non-combatants
    in clear violation of the Hague Conventions of 1899, which ban
    the killing of civilians and non-combatants, in Hiroshima and
    Nagasaki in 1945.

    People might claim that it is a single PERSON (Truman) and that
    that person (not a legal person or set of persons or organization)
    that did this. Truman has now died of natural causes. But the
    OFFICE still maintains nuclear weapons designed to murder over
    300 million US citizens, and perhaps 8 billion other people as
    well.

    Now it is reasonable that the possession of nuclear weapons might
    show intent to murder civilians because that seems to be what they
    were designed to do. They seem to be generally useful for killing
    civilians, and it is not obvious how easily they could be used
    without producing non-military civilian casualties.

    The OFFICE is not unique.

    The OFFICE of President of Russia, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of over 140 million citizens of the Russian Federation.
    The OFFICE of President of Russia, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of 8 billion human beings. It is not unique.

    The OFFICE of Prime Minster of England, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of over 60 million citizens of the United Kingdom.
    The OFFICE of Prime Minster of England, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of 8 billion human beings. It is not unique.

    The OFFICE of monarch of England, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of over 60 million citizens of the United Kingdom.
    The OFFICE of monarch of England, is GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of 8 billion human beings. It is not unique.

    You could go down the list. 12 angry men want to murder 8
    billion human beings.

    Others are called something like, the President of France,
    the Chairman of the Military Committee of the People's
    Republic of China, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, the
    President of Pakistan, the Prime Minister of India, the
    President of India, the President of North Korea, the
    Prime Minister of Israel.

    If the other 8 billion people besides them voted: A,
    I do not want to be murdered with nuclear weapons,
    or B, I do want to be murdered with nuclear weapons,
    how would they vote? Do the people of the world care
    if they are killed or not, regardless of if that is
    or is not called murder? Are the judges of the court
    systems of these nations civilians? Are the OFFICES
    of head of state or head of government of the nuclear
    powers, GUILTY of the attempted murder of all of the
    world's judges?

    Should the court systems of all of the world's nuclear
    powers confer with the other court systems of the
    nuclear powers to come to the conclusion that murder
    is wrong? If they do decide that murder is wrong,
    should they not order the dismantlement of all of
    the world's nuclear weapons themselves, and then
    abolish any executive position that tries to interfere?

    Once upon a time in the later 1700s there was a convention
    in Philadelphia. It sinned by creating an office called
    'President of the United States' that was different
    from the office under the Articles of Confederation.
    It may be that they did not conceive of it as mutating
    into something hideous with an unquestioned right to
    incinerate millions or billions of people at the
    press of a button.

    Twp of these usenet groups are physics related and
    nuclear weapons might use some phenomena observed
    in physics.

    You do not need to defend Rush Limbaugh from being
    murdered by the office of President of the United
    States anymore but consider a Constitutional
    amendment to keep the office from killing other
    people.

    Remember, if anyone were to execute any office
    holder of the President of the United States to
    prevent themselves or others from being murdered
    with nuclear weapons then the OFFICE would transfer
    to someone else.

    This is wrong.

    It should be abolished and the powers of the executive
    branch should be transferred to legislative committees
    like in Westminster systems.

    Consider a constitutional amendment to do that.

    The United States would have been better if the office
    had never existed, and it will be better in the future
    if it is abolished as quickly as possible in the present.

    The OFFICE of President of the United States, the way
    that it exists now, is founded upon nuclear terrorism.

    It should not exist at all.

    An act of nuclear terrorism formed the United Nations
    at the end of WWII.

    They should make up for past mistakes.

    They should expel all nuclear weapons states forever.

    And never allow them to rejoin until they they have
    completely and totally dismantled all of their nuclear
    arsenals.

    Signing the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty of 2017 with
    the reservation that they will not implement until
    all other nuclear weapons states have also signed -
    and also reservations concerning NNPT and reactors
    if that becomes a problem is UNTHINKABLE. Why?
    Because Mutual Assured Destruction is insanity.
    That is if the concept of 'mental disease' and
    'true ideas and good habits' is valid. Maybe
    you should ask the 'forgive me I'm sick I cry'
    guy to see if he is biased on that one.

    The OFFICE of President of the United States
    is a nuclear terrorist.

    That the OFFICE is NOT GUILTY of the attempted
    murder of 8 billion human beings is a double
    standard.

    The OFFICE of President of the United States
    is GUILTY of the attempted murder of the
    US Supreme Court, and the attempted murder
    of 8 billion human beings.

    The people of the United States should
    stand with the Constitution of the United
    States, the Supreme Court of the United
    States, and the people of the world, and
    not allow the OFFICE of President of
    the United States to attempt to murder
    8 billion human beings with nuclear
    weapons explicitly designed for the purpose.

    As for this other heckler guy, the US President
    should not murder him. The heckler guy should
    have the right to live. The existence of
    nuclear weapons that the US president can use
    based upon whim clearly shows that the heckler
    guy does NOT have the right to live. Ditto
    for 8 billion other people besides him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 28 21:16:25 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen





    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to
    never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 28 22:18:10 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000


    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a


    very high level of trust, security, transparency.




    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!



    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator. It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!



    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.


    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!


    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro


    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!


    rigging voting machines is ...boring.


    kid stuff.



    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to
    never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Jul 28 23:16:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    (i meant to write, winning, or wigging, not rigging)





    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator. It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 29 09:25:13 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, what is important is HOW 'the little people' handle the
    ...fraud.

    with a bang or a whimper..


    (dats wat the democats want to know)


    meow or
    roar?



    FUCK THE LITTLE PEOPLE, RIGHT?



    oh, i forgot..
    don't forget to vote...

    your vote counts.


    flip it, whip it


    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator. It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 29 09:57:23 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    You see, the Biden Adminstration (and all other government leaders) are not interested in
    the fraud...(they already know about how Dominion Voting Machines works)
    (they all want to buy one too!)

    What the Biden Adminstration is interested in, is how the 'little people' will respond.



    All government leaders are afraid of the ...'little people'.. will come to their house and
    put them in a gulitine.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdCZ6FLMYuY&t=23s













    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, what is important is HOW 'the little people' handle the
    ...fraud.

    with a bang or a whimper..

    (dats wat the democats want to know)

    meow or
    roar?

    FUCK THE LITTLE PEOPLE, RIGHT?

    oh, i forgot..
    don't forget to vote...

    your vote counts.

    flip it, whip it

    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.
    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name
    Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 29 10:36:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Who knows? Somebody might lift their hand up high and say..."FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!"



    The Starmaker wrote:

    You see, the Biden Adminstration (and all other government leaders) are not interested in
    the fraud...(they already know about how Dominion Voting Machines works) (they all want to buy one too!)

    What the Biden Adminstration is interested in, is how the 'little people' will respond.

    All government leaders are afraid of the ...'little people'.. will come to their house and
    put them in a gulitine.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdCZ6FLMYuY&t=23s

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, what is important is HOW 'the little people' handle the ...fraud.

    with a bang or a whimper..

    (dats wat the democats want to know)

    meow or
    roar?

    FUCK THE LITTLE PEOPLE, RIGHT?

    oh, i forgot..
    don't forget to vote...

    your vote counts.

    flip it, whip it

    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.
    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name
    Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 29 13:44:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    it has just begun...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzEipA31Jfc


    The Starmaker wrote:

    Who knows? Somebody might lift their hand up high and say..."FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    You see, the Biden Adminstration (and all other government leaders) are not interested in
    the fraud...(they already know about how Dominion Voting Machines works) (they all want to buy one too!)

    What the Biden Adminstration is interested in, is how the 'little people' will respond.

    All government leaders are afraid of the ...'little people'.. will come to their house and
    put them in a gulitine.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdCZ6FLMYuY&t=23s

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, what is important is HOW 'the little people' handle the ...fraud.

    with a bang or a whimper..

    (dats wat the democats want to know)

    meow or
    roar?

    FUCK THE LITTLE PEOPLE, RIGHT?

    oh, i forgot..
    don't forget to vote...

    your vote counts.

    flip it, whip it

    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.
    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name
    Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to
    never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jul 29 17:42:51 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of cource Putin already purchased those Dominion Voting Machines...but
    Putin made it clear that they MUST come with the ...source code.

    i'm sure he just wants to fool around with it...


    He doesn't have 'opponent' problems, he just throws them out the window.





    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator. It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jul 31 07:14:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    So, what is happening now?

    Is the CIA investigating, or is the CIA UNDER investigation????


    all i see is a bunch of cia guys scrambing for cover...


    I'm sure the shooter told a cia guy "I would like to be in the cia, wat do i gota do?"

    and the cia guy sez, "We are in the assasination business. Do you know anybody that needs to assasinated?"


    It's like if you wanna join a street gang...you have to kill somebody first!



    Personally, I never studied 'the assasination business'. I have no interest in joining a bunch of White guys called the CIA.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    btw, the shooter was a scientist studying at a community college...

    Is it ever remotely possible to study science at a ...community
    college?? who teaches there...drug addicts?

    btw, Lee Harvey Oswald was involved with the CIA Before he killed
    Kennedy...

    was this Trump shooter involved with the CIA months before the
    shooting???

    i want the names of all the people who shoots with the shooter...just
    the CIA guys. (not all the other shooters he shot with at that shooting range.)

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I don't understand what is all dis talk about 'the shooter's motive'?

    Are these people stupid or something???? The motive is...'election interference'!

    everybodys doing it! all the democrats have the same motive...'election manipulation'.

    a bullet is an effective vote.

    effective
    successful in producing a desired or intended result.

    The motive is...'election interference...democracy at work.

    All these people going after Trump all have the same motive.

    'election interference'.

    November will be the biggest 'election interference' in history!

    Stay tune to this thread on "How To Rig an Election in 2024".

    (dis thread will last to November 2024)

    dats only a few 30 days from now...

    The Starmaker wrote:

    So, I have To question the unquestionable, and ask the unaskable, ...

    did that guy who took a shot at Trump on the roof a member of the CIA????

    Because if he was a member of the CIA, then that would explain why

    he had...clearance. He was for a lack of a better word...undeterred.

    You know...everybody looking the other way...

    SONNY
    Where the hell was Paulie, why
    wasn't he with the Don?

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Let me explain the guy on the roof deal...

    The Cops, the FBI, The CIA all knew there was a guy on the roof...

    but, but..

    to take the guy out
    you need permission first.

    COPS:"IS DAT ONE OF YOUR GUYS?"
    FBI:"Hey CIA, is dat one of your guys?"
    CIA:"Hey, FBI, is dat one of your guys?"
    FBI:"Let me call Biden and see if is one of his guys."
    CIA:"Let me call Nancy Pelosi to see if that's her on the roof!" FBI:"I'll get back to you, let me check the insurance policies guys." CIA:"Let me check with the CIA within the CIA to see if is one of their guys."
    FBI:"FUCK! HEY, ANYBODY OUT THERE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP????"
    CIA:"HEY! WE'RE IN THE ASSASINATION BUSINESS! WHO GAVE YOU FBI GUYS PERMISSION??"
    FBI:"IT'S NOT ONE OF MY GUYS! IT'S GOTTA BE ONE OF YOUR GUYS!
    CIA:"I'LL GET BACK TO YOU."
    FBI:"FUCKING CIA GUYS!
    CIA:"WE'LL LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    BIDEN:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    NANCY PELOSI:"LET THE GUY TAKE A SHOT, THEN KILL HIM!"
    COPS: "WHAT????FUCKING FBI! FUCKING CIA!!"

    Oh, ok...it's just a nobody.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Jul 31 07:01:50 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Since Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro sez he won a third term with

    51% of votes...why would anyone doubt him??? Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines in his country

    are programmed to win with 51% of the votes!

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.


    In computer lingo, it is programmed using an algorithm to calculate the votes needed
    to flip the votes. It is programmed to take 51% of the vote and flip it from opponent to Maduro.

    Numbers don't lie.


    So, your vote counts. Your vote is needed to flip the vote. No vote, no flip.

    The computer needs a person behind the computer screen to select the vote in order for the flip to be activated.



    So, your vote counts.


    Do I need to post the code????


    The way it is programmed (i programmed it), it only flips the vote once
    you made a selection.



    So, your vote counts.



    No vote, no flip.


    Go out and vote! Machines are waiting...



    Let me put it this way...


    The defintion of Dominion is...FRAUD!






    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 2 09:08:23 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-maduro-opposition-machado-gonzalez-0530458d57d3a2694fc0b5acbc1f5b01

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-brazil-mexico-colombia-diplomacy-fa5780b54ffd166b4e20513d5b457512


    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large



    In the United States of America you are not allowed to say the word...Dominion Voting Machines..

    cause the Biden adminstration will send their political thugs in motocycles after you.


    The more things change, the more they remain the same...

    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large




    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of cource Putin already purchased those Dominion Voting Machines...but
    Putin made it clear that they MUST come with the ...source code.

    i'm sure he just wants to fool around with it...

    He doesn't have 'opponent' problems, he just throws them out the window.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.
    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name
    Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 2 09:19:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Things haven't changed much since the year 1871...


    https://thomasnast.com/cartoons/thats-whats-the-matter/







    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-maduro-opposition-machado-gonzalez-0530458d57d3a2694fc0b5acbc1f5b01

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-brazil-mexico-colombia-diplomacy-fa5780b54ffd166b4e20513d5b457512

    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    In the United States of America you are not allowed to say the word...Dominion Voting Machines..

    cause the Biden adminstration will send their political thugs in motocycles after you.

    The more things change, the more they remain the same...

    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of cource Putin already purchased those Dominion Voting Machines...but Putin made it clear that they MUST come with the ...source code.

    i'm sure he just wants to fool around with it...

    He doesn't have 'opponent' problems, he just throws them out the window.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    https://apnews.com/live/venezuela-election-updates-maduro-machado-gonzalez#00000190-fccf-dae3-a7f3-fedfe4bb0000

    Maduro applauds electoral system in first speech after being declared victor
    BY REGINA GARCIA CANO

    In his first speech after being named the winner of Sundays presidential election, Maduro praised his countrys electoral system, describing it as one with a

    very high level of trust, security, transparency.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.
    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!

    i think i'll run for Governor of New York...i don't think i'll have any problems rigging the election.

    Dominion Voting Machines...there is no substitute! I WANT ONE OF THESE!!!!

    "very high level of trust, security, transparency." - President of Venesula Maduro

    but i have no problem throwing my opponents out the window...it's more fun!

    rigging voting machines is ...boring.

    kid stuff.

    So, you people trust the "very high level of trust, security, transparency." of Dominion Voting Machines...raise your stupid hands.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    This just in a minute ago

    https://news.google.com/search?q=maduro%20declared%20winner&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

    The Starmaker wrote:

    And how do you think the Spanish Venesula Dictator came up with the name
    Dominion?

    The Dominion translation is: dominium

    Property, ownership, authority, or territory: Subject to a king or ruler
    Power to rule: Control of a country or region
    Land: Controlled by a ruler or government
    Supreme authority: Sovereignty
    Absolute ownership: In law

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion Voting machines to never lose an election.

    I WANT ONE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 2 17:48:37 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:66AD0477.483F@ix.netcom.com:

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-maduro-opposition-machado -gonzalez-0530458d57d3a2694fc0b5acbc1f5b01

    https://apnews.com/article/venezuela-election-brazil-mexico-colombia-di plomacy-fa5780b54ffd166b4e20513d5b457512


    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mo de=large



    In the United States of America you are not allowed to say the word...Dominion Voting Machines..

    cause the Biden adminstration will send their political thugs in
    motocycles after you.



    Funny that EVERY Republican recount
    and audit shows that Biden won.

    And as for Dominion, well, even Fox
    news admitted their defamation and settled
    with them out of court.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chips Loral@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Fri Aug 2 12:07:29 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Mitchell Holman wrote:
    EVERY Republican recount
    and audit shows that Biden won

    One more cornholing lie!

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-republican-party-passes-resolution-denying-legitimacy-of-bidens-victory-in-presidential-election/

    The Texas Republican Party officially rejected the results of the 2020 presidential election over the weekend

    "We reject the certified results of the 2020 Presidential election, and
    we hold that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not
    legitimately elected by the people of the United States," the resolution
    reads. It claims that the elections in five states violated Articles 1
    and 2 of the Constitution because "various secretaries of state
    illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their
    elections in multiple ways, including by allowing ballots to be received
    after November 3, 2020."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Tue Aug 20 23:07:21 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Soon Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines owners will meet with
    Kamal Harris and ask her...

    by how many votes do you want us to rig our voting machines?

    She'll say "100%!!!"

    Dominion: That's too much. It would look like fraud.

    Kamala: How about 99%?

    Dominion: You can still win with 51% of rigged votes.

    Kamala: How about 98%?

    Dominion: That's still too much.


    Kamala: "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK! i'M IMPLEMENTING A "OPERATION
    KNOCK-KNOCK". ANYONE COMPLAINS THAT IT IS RIGGED I'LL PUT AN
    'X' MARK ON THEIR DOORS!! DRAG THEM OUT OF THE HOUSE TO JAIL."
    AND IF THEY RESIST, SHOOT THEM!"




    On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:01:50 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Since Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro sez he won a third term with

    51% of votes...why would anyone doubt him??? Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines in his country

    are programmed to win with 51% of the votes!

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.


    In computer lingo, it is programmed using an algorithm to calculate the votes needed
    to flip the votes. It is programmed to take 51% of the vote and flip it from opponent to Maduro.

    Numbers don't lie.


    So, your vote counts. Your vote is needed to flip the vote. No vote, no flip.

    The computer needs a person behind the computer screen to select the vote in order for the flip to be activated.



    So, your vote counts.


    Do I need to post the code????


    The way it is programmed (i programmed it), it only flips the vote once
    you made a selection.



    So, your vote counts.



    No vote, no flip.


    Go out and vote! Machines are waiting...



    Let me put it this way...


    The defintion of Dominion is...FRAUD!






    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 22 00:26:22 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    I just wonder..How Much does Dominion Voting Machines charge to rig
    their machines?

    Anybody know what the going rate today is?

    I would have to guess at least two suitcases..

    dats how much i would charge.

    In two months you'll know...


    dats around 60 revolutions of our sun...


    there is no future
    it's just the sun going around

    Just as Biden had his eye on Maduro election...
    Maduro will have his eye on the U.S. election.



    The Starmaker wrote:

    Soon Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines owners will meet with
    Kamal Harris and ask her...

    by how many votes do you want us to rig our voting machines?

    She'll say "100%!!!"

    Dominion: That's too much. It would look like fraud.

    Kamala: How about 99%?

    Dominion: You can still win with 51% of rigged votes.

    Kamala: How about 98%?

    Dominion: That's still too much.

    Kamala: "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK! i'M IMPLEMENTING A "OPERATION
    KNOCK-KNOCK". ANYONE COMPLAINS THAT IT IS RIGGED I'LL PUT AN
    'X' MARK ON THEIR DOORS!! DRAG THEM OUT OF THE HOUSE TO JAIL."
    AND IF THEY RESIST, SHOOT THEM!"

    On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:01:50 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Since Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro sez he won a third term with

    51% of votes...why would anyone doubt him??? Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines in his country

    are programmed to win with 51% of the votes!

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.


    In computer lingo, it is programmed using an algorithm to calculate the votes needed
    to flip the votes. It is programmed to take 51% of the vote and flip it from opponent to Maduro.

    Numbers don't lie.


    So, your vote counts. Your vote is needed to flip the vote. No vote, no flip.

    The computer needs a person behind the computer screen to select the vote in order for the flip to be activated.



    So, your vote counts.


    Do I need to post the code????


    The way it is programmed (i programmed it), it only flips the vote once
    you made a selection.



    So, your vote counts.



    No vote, no flip.


    Go out and vote! Machines are waiting...



    Let me put it this way...


    The defintion of Dominion is...FRAUD!






    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 23 08:28:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    As you probably heard by now in the news...

    "Venezuela's Supreme Court certifies Maduro's election win claims"



    Not only does he has to rig the
    Dominion Voting Machines to win, he has to rig...

    The Supreme Court!

    Dis guy is busy rigging everything.

    He spends most of his time delivering ...suitcases.


    How much does a Supreme Court judge cost ...nowadays?


    If I want to be President of the United States..

    LOOK AT ALL THESE FUCKING PEOPLE I GOT TO PAY!!!!


    I mean, i gotta pay Dominion Voting Machines to make sure I win
    the election. I gotta pay the judges to make sure it doesn't get overturned...

    ALL THESE FUCKING PEOPLE GOT THEIR HANDS OUT!!!!



    yous have no idea how tiresome it is having to
    wakeup, filling suitcases with money, having to
    deliver myself the suitcases cause i cannot trust
    anyone around me, before you know it the day is
    over and i haven't had a chance to do my work!


    ALL THESE FUCKING PEOPLE GOT THEIR HANDS OUT!!!!


    If I become President of the United States of America, yous
    are going to have to leave this country but leave your
    suitcases at home cause i'm going to need them.


    God Bless America










    The Starmaker wrote:

    I just wonder..How Much does Dominion Voting Machines charge to rig
    their machines?

    Anybody know what the going rate today is?

    I would have to guess at least two suitcases..

    dats how much i would charge.

    In two months you'll know...

    dats around 60 revolutions of our sun...

    there is no future
    it's just the sun going around

    Just as Biden had his eye on Maduro election...
    Maduro will have his eye on the U.S. election.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Soon Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines owners will meet with
    Kamal Harris and ask her...

    by how many votes do you want us to rig our voting machines?

    She'll say "100%!!!"

    Dominion: That's too much. It would look like fraud.

    Kamala: How about 99%?

    Dominion: You can still win with 51% of rigged votes.

    Kamala: How about 98%?

    Dominion: That's still too much.

    Kamala: "I DON'T GIVE A FUCK! i'M IMPLEMENTING A "OPERATION
    KNOCK-KNOCK". ANYONE COMPLAINS THAT IT IS RIGGED I'LL PUT AN
    'X' MARK ON THEIR DOORS!! DRAG THEM OUT OF THE HOUSE TO JAIL."
    AND IF THEY RESIST, SHOOT THEM!"

    On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:01:50 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Since Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro sez he won a third term with

    51% of votes...why would anyone doubt him??? Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines in his country

    are programmed to win with 51% of the votes!

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.


    In computer lingo, it is programmed using an algorithm to calculate the votes needed
    to flip the votes. It is programmed to take 51% of the vote and flip it from opponent to Maduro.

    Numbers don't lie.


    So, your vote counts. Your vote is needed to flip the vote. No vote, no flip.

    The computer needs a person behind the computer screen to select the vote in order for the flip to be activated.



    So, your vote counts.


    Do I need to post the code????


    The way it is programmed (i programmed it), it only flips the vote once >you made a selection.



    So, your vote counts.



    No vote, no flip.


    Go out and vote! Machines are waiting...



    Let me put it this way...


    The defintion of Dominion is...FRAUD!






    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, here are "FACTS" YOU WON'T BELIEVE!

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines was founded by the Venesula Dictator.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    I'm sure all the Democrats will be watching Sunday's election in Venezuela...

    that's how they will learn...

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (all you need is one USB stick)

    One
    usb
    stick.

    Just
    one.

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    with a usb stick
    you can make a
    fake screen.

    and it will
    match the print out...

    but the vote was flipped.

    The print out equals the count on the machine.

    but the vote was flipped.

    A fake screen!

    pishing!

    I mean, come on...dis is kids stuff!

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    (the whole democrats are watching)

    Learn grasshopper, learn.

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Like Bill Gates once said: "Where there is a lock, there is a key."

    and the key chain contains a USB stick.

    So, when you vote, and you look at the screen...is it real?

    (make sure your receipt matches your screen)

    How To Rig an Election in 2024

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    (the whole democrats world are watching)

    will there be a recount?
    cancel the election?

    who knows?

    Watch Venesula
    and see
    what happens.

    It's a playbook.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >> and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 29 08:40:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."


    The Starmaker wrote:

    Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
    could have easily won '

    'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'

    But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
    Machines rigs the count.

    Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
    about it?" https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    The more things change, the more they remain the same.

    On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >>> >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >>> > > >
    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>> > > > there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>> > > > principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>> > > > party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >>> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >>> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >>> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>> > > > field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>> > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>> > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >>> > > >
    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Thu Aug 29 08:19:26 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
    could have easily won '

    'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'


    But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
    Machines rigs the count.


    Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
    about it?" https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large



    The more things change, the more they remain the same.









    On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election? >>

    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for? >>> > > >
    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people >>> > > > there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the >>> > > > principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or >>> > > > party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the >>> > > > electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within. >>> > > >
    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.

    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
    disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks, >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing >>> > > > field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.

    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment. >>> > > >
    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false
    appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 29 09:06:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    'heads i win, tails you lose'


    when i was a kid i always carried a
    two-headed quarter.


    cheating is sooo much fun..

    you go through life always winning!


    i don't play strip poker with girls without a marked deck...











    The Starmaker wrote:

    Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
    could have easily won '

    'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'

    But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting Machines rigs the count.

    Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
    about it?" https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    The more things change, the more they remain the same.

    On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!" >>> >
    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >>> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >>> > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >>> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >>> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >>> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker >>> > > > opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >>> > > >
    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one >>> > > > candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 29 09:49:31 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
    is...Venezuelan-born????


    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!


    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?


    Bribing him is a piece of cake.


    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
    to rig the count?




    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West


    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.



    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...





    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024


    Let's make it a Netfix special!















    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 29 12:08:42 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    There's got to be a morning after
    If we can hold on through the night
    We have a chance to find the sunshine
    Let's keep on looking for the light

    Oh, can't you see the morning after?
    It's waiting right outside the storm
    Why don't we cross the bridge together
    And find a place that's safe and warm?

    It's not too late, we should be giving
    Only with love can we climb
    It's not too late, not while we're living
    Let's put our hands out in time

    There's got to be a morning after
    We're moving closer to the shore
    I know we'll be there by tomorrow
    And we'll escape the darkness
    We won't be searching anymore

    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)
    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)
    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)
    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)
    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)
    There's got to be a morning after
    (There's got to be a morning after)





    The Starmaker wrote:

    What I don't really understand is...

    how is Donald Trump going to be able to
    monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
    from being rigged????

    I don't get it!

    Why even bother ?

    I just don't get it!

    Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born????

    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!

    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?

    Bribing him is a piece of cake.

    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
    to rig the count?

    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West

    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.

    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...

    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    Let's make it a Netfix special!

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Aug 29 12:01:33 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What I don't really understand is...

    how is Donald Trump going to be able to
    monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
    from being rigged????

    I don't get it!

    Why even bother ?


    I just don't get it!


    Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????




    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born????

    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!

    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?

    Bribing him is a piece of cake.

    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much to rig the count?

    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West

    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.

    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...

    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    Let's make it a Netfix special!

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gravy@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 29 20:54:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Trump is still spinning from having the last election stolen from right
    under his hapless nose. What kind of loser gets an election stolen from
    him? Unfit to lead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Gravy on Thu Aug 29 21:54:01 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    May the best rigger win.



    Gravy wrote:

    Trump is still spinning from having the last election stolen from right
    under his hapless nose. What kind of loser gets an election stolen from
    him? Unfit to lead.



    What I don't really understand is...

    how is Donald Trump going to be able to
    monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
    from being rigged????

    I don't get it!

    Why even bother ?


    I just don't get it!


    vIsn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????




    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born????

    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!

    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?

    Bribing him is a piece of cake.

    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much to rig the count?

    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West

    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.

    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...

    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    Let's make it a Netfix special!

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 30 21:26:25 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt

    DECLARATION OF

    I, , hereby state the following:

    1.



    2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
    based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.

    3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
    have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
    for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any
    profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
    harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
    for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the
    United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.

    4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
    people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
    United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental
    rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
    Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
    conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves
    political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
    is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and subverting the proper course of governing.

    5.





    6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
    and

    - Page 1 of 8











    7.

    - Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
    briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was imp1isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
    Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
    President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice
    President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
    and became the second most powerful figtne in the party after Hugo
    Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
    early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januaiy 2013. After Hugo Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line 01 the presidency of the
    country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
    to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.

    8.










    precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
    he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111, who was to attend, what was
    to

    9.


    - Page 2 of8

    sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
    and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
    gain and maintain their power.

    10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
    an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
    This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
    person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
    Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
    Smartmatic which included . The
    purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
    that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
    running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to
    maintain control of the government.

    11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
    the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials, including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
    permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.

    12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
    make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
    of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic.
    Among the three Smartmatic representatives were

    President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
    Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
    manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
    would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to
    create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
    going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
    Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
    large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
    system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle. Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.

    13. I arranged and attended tluee more meetings between President
    Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
    new

    voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
    meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
    meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the
    meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the
    participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
    point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
    wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.

    14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n
    Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
    in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
    transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display, fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
    the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized
    record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
    entire system.

    15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
    that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
    detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
    that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a
    scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
    name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
    the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
    setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
    and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
    that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed
    vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
    software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
    Chavez.

    16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
    using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
    Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
    Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
    3.7 million for Rosales.

    17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
    in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
    manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez


    -- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
    multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
    each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
    room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
    a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
    room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
    the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one
    looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
    any specific area oras a national total was going against either
    candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
    ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
    candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.

    18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
    Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
    and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
    worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
    entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
    controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
    in Venezuela and to change the results.

    19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
    the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
    turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running
    again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
    could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
    that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles
    Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had
    achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.

    20. After Smartmatic created the voting system President Chavez wanted,
    he exported the software and system all over Latin America. It was sent
    to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Algentina, Ecuador, and Chile - countries that
    were in alliance with President Chavez. This was a group of leaders who
    wanted to be able to guarantee they maintained power in their countries.
    when Chavez died, Smartmatic was in a position of being the only

    company that could guarantee results in Venezuelan elections for the
    party in power.

    21. I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic
    software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company's software and
    system.

    22. Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the
    United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same
    software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did
    business together. The software, hardware and system have the same
    fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data
    and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any
    fraud or manipulation. The fact that the voting machine displays a
    voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot
    which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that
    counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself
    is the one that changes the information electronically to the result
    that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to
    produce that counts. That's how it is done. So the software, the
    software itself configures the vote and voting result -- changing the
    selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless
    of what the voter votes.

    23. All of the computer controlled voting tabulation is done in a closed environment so that the voter and any observer cannot detect what is
    taking place unless there is a malfunction or other event which causes
    the observer to question the process. I saw first-hand that the
    manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the
    secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it
    was something very surprising and disturbing. I was in awe because I had
    never been present to actually see it occur and I saw it happen. So, I
    learned first hand that it doesn't matter what the voter decides or
    what the paper ballot says. It's the software operator and the software
    that decides what counts - not the voter.

    24. If one questions the reliability of my observations, they only have
    to read

    which Smartmatic had possession of all the votes and the voting, the
    votes themselves and the voting information at their disposition in
    Venezuela.

    -- he was assuring that the voting system implemented or used by Smartmatic was completely secure, that it could not be compromised, was
    not able to be altered.

    25. But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was
    running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, -- and Smartmatic
    broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela. He made a
    public announcement through the media in which he stated that all the Smartmatic voting machines used during those elections were totally
    manipulated and they were manipulated by the electoral council of
    Venezuela back then. stated that all of the votes for Nicholas Maduro
    and the other persons running for the legislature were manipulated and
    they actually had lost. So I think that's the greatest proof that the
    fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote counting software that can be manipulated or altered.

    26. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this
    2020 election for President of the United States. The circumstances and
    events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in
    Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting
    was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time
    that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in
    the votes. Then during the weehours of the morning, when there was no
    voting occurring and the vote count reporting was off-line, something significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next
    morning there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the
    opposing candidate, Joe Biden.

    27. I have worked in gathering
    information, researching, and working with information technology.
    That's what I know how to do and the special knowledge that I have. Due
    to these recent election events, I contacted a number of reliable and intelligent ex-co-workers of mine that are still informants and work
    with the intelligence community. I asked for them to give me information
    that was up-to-date information in as far as how all these businesses
    are acting, what actions they are taking.

    I declaie under penalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and
    correct and that this Declaiation was prepared in Dallas County, State
    of Texas, and executed on November 15, 2020.


    The Starmaker wrote:

    What I don't really understand is...

    how is Donald Trump going to be able to
    monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
    from being rigged????

    I don't get it!

    Why even bother ?

    I just don't get it!

    Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born????

    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!

    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?

    Bribing him is a piece of cake.

    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
    to rig the count?

    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West

    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.

    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...

    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    Let's make it a Netfix special!

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Aug 30 22:09:32 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What would happen if
    on election day
    the machine-reported zero votes for Trump?





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt

    DECLARATION OF

    I, , hereby state the following:

    1.

    2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
    based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.

    3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
    have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
    for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
    harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
    for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.

    4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
    people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
    United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
    Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
    conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
    is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and subverting the proper course of governing.

    5.

    6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
    and

    - Page 1 of 8

    7.

    - Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
    briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was imp1isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
    Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
    President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice
    President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
    and became the second most powerful figtne in the party after Hugo
    Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
    early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januaiy 2013. After Hugo Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line 01 the presidency of the
    country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
    to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.

    8.

    precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
    he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111, who was to attend, what was
    to

    9.

    - Page 2 of8

    sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
    and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
    gain and maintain their power.

    10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
    an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
    This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
    person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
    Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
    Smartmatic which included . The
    purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
    that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
    running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to maintain control of the government.

    11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
    the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials, including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
    permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.

    12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
    make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
    of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic. Among the three Smartmatic representatives were

    President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
    Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
    manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
    would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
    going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
    Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
    large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
    system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle. Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.

    13. I arranged and attended tluee more meetings between President
    Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
    new

    voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
    meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
    meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
    point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
    wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.

    14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
    in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
    transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display, fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
    the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
    entire system.

    15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
    that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
    detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
    that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
    name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
    the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
    setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
    and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
    that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
    software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
    Chavez.

    16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
    using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
    Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
    Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
    3.7 million for Rosales.

    17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
    in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
    manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez

    -- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
    multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
    each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
    room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
    a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
    room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
    the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
    any specific area oras a national total was going against either
    candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
    ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
    candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.

    18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
    Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
    and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
    worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
    entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
    controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
    in Venezuela and to change the results.

    19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
    the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
    turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
    could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
    that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.

    20. After Smartmatic created the voting system President Chavez wanted,
    he exported the software and system all over Latin America. It was sent
    to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Algentina, Ecuador, and Chile - countries that
    were in alliance with President Chavez. This was a group of leaders who wanted to be able to guarantee they maintained power in their countries. when Chavez died, Smartmatic was in a position of being the only

    company that could guarantee results in Venezuelan elections for the
    party in power.

    21. I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic
    software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company's software and system.

    22. Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same
    software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did
    business together. The software, hardware and system have the same fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data
    and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any
    fraud or manipulation. The fact that the voting machine displays a
    voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot
    which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that
    counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself
    is the one that changes the information electronically to the result
    that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to
    produce that counts. That's how it is done. So the software, the
    software itself configures the vote and voting result -- changing the selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless
    of what the voter votes.

    23. All of the computer controlled voting tabulation is done in a closed environment so that the voter and any observer cannot detect what is
    taking place unless there is a malfunction or other event which causes
    the observer to question the process. I saw first-hand that the
    manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the
    secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it
    was something very surprising and disturbing. I was in awe because I had never been present to actually see it occur and I saw it happen. So, I learned first hand that it doesn't matter what the voter decides or
    what the paper ballot says. It's the software operator and the software
    that decides what counts - not the voter.

    24. If one questions the reliability of my observations, they only have
    to read

    which Smartmatic had possession of all the votes and the voting, the
    votes themselves and the voting information at their disposition in Venezuela.

    -- he was assuring that the voting system implemented or used by Smartmatic was completely secure, that it could not be compromised, was
    not able to be altered.

    25. But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was
    running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, -- and Smartmatic
    broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela. He made a
    public announcement through the media in which he stated that all the Smartmatic voting machines used during those elections were totally manipulated and they were manipulated by the electoral council of
    Venezuela back then. stated that all of the votes for Nicholas Maduro
    and the other persons running for the legislature were manipulated and
    they actually had lost. So I think that's the greatest proof that the
    fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote counting software that can be manipulated or altered.

    26. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this
    2020 election for President of the United States. The circumstances and events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in
    Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting
    was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time
    that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in
    the votes. Then during the weehours of the morning, when there was no
    voting occurring and the vote count reporting was off-line, something significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next
    morning there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the
    opposing candidate, Joe Biden.

    27. I have worked in gathering
    information, researching, and working with information technology.
    That's what I know how to do and the special knowledge that I have. Due
    to these recent election events, I contacted a number of reliable and intelligent ex-co-workers of mine that are still informants and work
    with the intelligence community. I asked for them to give me information
    that was up-to-date information in as far as how all these businesses
    are acting, what actions they are taking.

    I declaie under penalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and
    correct and that this Declaiation was prepared in Dallas County, State
    of Texas, and executed on November 15, 2020.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    What I don't really understand is...

    how is Donald Trump going to be able to
    monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
    from being rigged????

    I don't get it!

    Why even bother ?

    I just don't get it!

    Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.

    Did you know
    did you know
    did you know...

    that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born????

    The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!

    He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?

    Bribing him is a piece of cake.

    Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
    to rig the count?

    "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West

    I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.

    give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...

    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    Let's make it a Netfix special!

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 30 22:22:01 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://apnews.com/article/smartmatic-venezuela-election-voting-machines-9a3e334f149f962be9d982bf4a11dc43

    MIAMI (AP) A federal indictment has charged three current and former executives of Smartmatic in a scheme to pay more than $1 million in bribes to put its voting machines in the Philippines, a setback for a company that has been feuding with allies of
    Donald Trump over unsubstantiated claims that it manipulated the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

    The Justice Department in a statement Thursday said Smartmatics Venezuelan-born co-founder Roger Piate and a colleague at the Boca Raton, Florida-based company funneled bribes to the chairman of the Philippines electoral commission through a slush
    fund created by overcharging for the cost of each voting machine it supplied authorities.

    The payments, between 2015 and 2018, were made to obtain business with the Philippines and secure the timely payment for its work, the Justice Department said in a statement, which, like the indictment, does not mention Smartmatic by name.

    To hide the corrupt payments to Juan Donato Bautista, the former chairman of the Commission on Elections in the Philippines, the co-conspirators allegedly created a slush fund codenamed the Philippines Pot, according to investigators and sham loan
    agreements to justify transfers to bank accounts located in Singapore, Hong Kong, Switzerland, New York and Florida. Nearly $1 million of the illegal payments were used by a family member of Bautista to purchase property in San Francisco.

    The investigation of the Smartmatic executives started in 2017, when the wife of Bautista informed investigators in the Philippines that her husband had obtained $20 million in unexplained wealth, some of it in stacks of cash found at their home.

    Bautista was arrested last year on a criminal complaint from Miami that accuses him of taking the bribes in exchange for awarding an unnamed company nearly $200 million in contracts to supply tens of thousands of Taiwanese-manufactured voting machines
    and related services for the 2016 presidential elections. Before his arrest he denied ever taking money from Smartmatic or any other entity. Nonetheless authorities in the Philippines banned Smartmatic from bidding on a contract to provide election
    technology for the 2025 election.

    Smartmatic in a statement said it had placed the two employees on leaves of absence, effective immediately.

    No voter fraud has been alleged and Smartmatic is not indicted, the company said in a statement. Voters worldwide must be assured that the elections they participate in are conducted with the utmost integrity and transparency.

    Piate co-founded Smartmatic more than two decades ago and its initial success is partly attributable to major contracts from the government of Hugo Chavez, an early devotee of electronic voting, in Piates native Venezuela. It has since expanded
    globally and helped carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia as well as several European countries.

    In 2017, Smartmatic broke all ties with Venezuela when it accused President Nicolas Maduros government of manipulating turnout figures in the countrys election for a national constituent assembly. Smartmatic said that the turnout announced by the
    government was inflated by about 1 million votes.

    Piate, who was also serving as Smartmatics president, and Jorge Miguel Vasquez were each charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison. Both reside in south
    Florida. Along with Elie Moreno, a dual citizen of Venezuela and Israel who managed Smartmatics relations with the Philippines, they were also charged with several money laundering charges that carry a maximum penalty of 20 years.

    Piate on his LinkedIn profile touts Smartmatics corporate motto: Protecting election integrity is at the core of what we do.

    Smartmatic sued Fox News for airing false claims that software it developed altered the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In April, another conservative media outlet, One America News Network, settled with Smartmatic similar allegations for
    undisclosed terms.

    Reportedly funding Smartmatics costly defamation suit is LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the indictment against the Smartmatic executives.

    Smartmatic has also sued several Trump allies, including his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, but the claims against him are on hold while his bankruptcy case plays out.

    Fox News earlier tried unsuccessfully to get dismissed out of the case, which also named hosts Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro and former host Lou Dobbs. An appeals court threw out claims against network parent Fox Corp., but Smartmatic refiled them.

    All software accused of altering the outcome of the 2020 U.S. election was developed a decade ago by a U.S. affiliate of Smartmatic.

    Fact-checkers at the AP and other outlets have debunked the far-fetched claims. But Trump attorney Sidney Powell nonetheless appeared on Fox News shortly after the election accusing Maduros former chief of staff of being the ringleader of what she
    called a Cyber Pearl Harbor involving Smartmatic.

    In the 2020 U.S. election, Smartmatic technology was used in a single district: Los Angeles County, California. It also doesnt have any existing ties to Dominion Voting Systems, a rival that the Trump team has accused of being part of the plot.

    Fox countersued under a New York law against lobbing frivolous litigation to try to silence reporting or commentary on public matters. Smartmatic tried in vain to get those counterclaims tossed out.
    Image



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 31 10:26:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.


    Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.



    The software is programmed to never lose an election.


    Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)



    I love loaded dice too! (i play strip dice with girls)


    When you tell a girl, "Let's play strip poker!!!!" and she
    smiles...you're in like flint! get your marked deck out!!!


    of course, she'll get a little angry when she notices all her clothes
    are off and yours are still on...

    she'll say..."WHAT KIND OF FUCKING CARDS DO YOU GOT???!"



    How about dice?



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Aug 31 15:34:49 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    <kooksnip>

    *PLONK*

    --
    The very ink with which all history is written is merely fluid prejudice.
    -- Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Aug 31 16:28:59 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic

    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting machines to never lose an election.

    Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.

    The software is programmed to never lose an election.

    Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)

    Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder


    Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.

    Piate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the companys former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.

    Piate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Jos Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chvez to replace the countrys voting machines in 2004. The company grew by
    acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.


    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html


    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/



    I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???


    You fuckin let them run it????


    WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????


    Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!


    I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!



    Where can I buy one?

    This is better than playing strip poker with a marked deck!


    I have another question...are those slot machines in Vegas...rigged????


    i think Lays potatoe chips bags are rigged...

    Oh, I forgot...go out and vote, your vote counts.

    and counts
    and counts
    and counts
    and counts
    and counts

    One for you, two for me
    One for you, two for me
    One for you, two for me
    One for you, two for me


    dats how i count!




    teacher always told me.."Starmaker, keep your eyes on your own paper!!"


    Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and contain modems
    so that you can view results from a laptop...


    "Okay, add another million votes."




    I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!




    i know, most of yous look the other way...



    You don't see me looking the other way.




    Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.

    Piate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the companys former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.

    Piate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo Jos Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by
    Venezuelan president Hugo Chvez to replace the countrys voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.


    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html


    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme

    https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/



    Miami, Castro town.













    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 1 14:45:20 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh


    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting machines!!!!

    Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

    The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
    have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Gary on Sun Sep 1 10:36:17 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Gary wrote:


    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting machines!!!!

    Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

    The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
    have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.


    Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.


    In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.


    Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.


    That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.


    It is too late for them to change the source code.


    every line of code is rigged.


    There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!


    If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.


    In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.



    If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.


    God is on the side of the rigger.


    I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.


    Isn't that the way life should be?


    (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)


    all i know
    there is no way
    i'm going to play
    strip poker with
    a bunch of girls
    without
    a marked deck of cards...
    ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?


    Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"









    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Sep 1 23:34:26 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The selling point is...
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are designed to never lose an election.



    There are hundreds of governments
    that would pay 'any price' for
    a voting machine
    designed to never lose an election.















    The Starmaker wrote:

    Gary wrote:


    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic >Voting machines!!!!

    Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

    The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

    Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.

    Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.

    That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.

    It is too late for them to change the source code.

    every line of code is rigged.

    There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!

    If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.

    In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.

    If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.

    God is on the side of the rigger.

    I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.

    Isn't that the way life should be?

    (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)

    all i know
    there is no way
    i'm going to play
    strip poker with
    a bunch of girls
    without
    a marked deck of cards...
    ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?

    Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Sep 2 09:24:13 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Of course, my Question is
    (and i don't know the answer)

    Who decides which way the
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are rigged for in the United States?

    Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.

    Someone gives the order.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?


    i don't know the answer.




    And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.


    The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.


    In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.



    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?


    i don't know the answer.


    All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.



    The Starmaker wrote:

    The selling point is...
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are designed to never lose an election.

    There are hundreds of governments
    that would pay 'any price' for
    a voting machine
    designed to never lose an election.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Gary wrote:


    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic >Voting machines!!!!

    Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
    Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
    that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

    The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

    Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.

    Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.

    That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.

    It is too late for them to change the source code.

    every line of code is rigged.

    There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!

    If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.

    In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.

    If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.

    God is on the side of the rigger.

    I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.

    Isn't that the way life should be?

    (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)

    all i know
    there is no way
    i'm going to play
    strip poker with
    a bunch of girls
    without
    a marked deck of cards...
    ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?

    Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Sep 3 12:16:28 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In Today's news...

    Maduro Orders Arrest of Rival to Quell Venezuela Dissent
    Bloomberg News
    Mon, September 2, 2024, 3:55 PM PDT2 min read
    Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzlez, an escalation of the governments crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html



    That is the playbook the Democrats will follow if Trump loses the election and DARES to disputed the election.

    They will arrest him.


    Maduro is someone the democracts look up to on


    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024!








    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, my Question is
    (and i don't know the answer)

    Who decides which way the
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are rigged for in the United States?

    Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.

    Someone gives the order.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.

    The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.

    In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The selling point is...
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are designed to never lose an election.

    There are hundreds of governments
    that would pay 'any price' for
    a voting machine
    designed to never lose an election.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Gary wrote:


    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic >Voting machines!!!!

    Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
    Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
    that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

    The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

    Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.

    Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.

    That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.

    It is too late for them to change the source code.

    every line of code is rigged.

    There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!

    If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.

    In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.

    If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.

    God is on the side of the rigger.

    I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.

    Isn't that the way life should be?

    (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)

    all i know
    there is no way
    i'm going to play
    strip poker with
    a bunch of girls
    without
    a marked deck of cards...
    ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?

    Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Sep 4 10:56:55 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Okay, things are becoming clearer with recent events...

    as you already heard there is no X/twitter in Brazil (they turned it off)

    China OWNS BRAZIL!

    then elon post a picture of Kamala in a red china communist uniform...

    Kamala is a Chineese Communists. and her vice president been to
    China over 50 times, why?

    The Biden family is owned lock, stock and barrel by China.

    China OWNS BRAZIL! (China rigged Brazil elections)


    Answer: China decides who will win on November in USA elections.


    The goal of China is to be Head of a One World Govenment.


    (invented by albert einstein)



    anybody figured out how to get rid of those chink shows on Netflix?



    What i don't understand is why does China keep sending 'women' spies to top jobs in politics ..

    who wants to fuck a chink????


    Any chinks working in Wahington DC, ...GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!


    GO BACK TO FUCKIN CHINA!


    Won ton soup? WATDAFUCKISDAT????


    fishface


    What is the reason why God made people with slanted eyes?? IS HE FUCKING NUTS!!!!


    Is that a joke?

    Is he playing some kind of joke???

    "Look Mom, look at what I just made, fishfaces!"


    "Oh great, what are you going to do with the Black paint?"






    Maduro should come to the United States and run for President..he knows how to win elections.


    HE ALREADY SENT ALL HIS FUCKING PEOPLE HERE!!!!







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, my Question is
    (and i don't know the answer)

    Who decides which way the
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are rigged for in the United States?

    Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.

    Someone gives the order.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.

    The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.

    In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.


    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Sep 5 10:00:21 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now if you observed the Democrats...
    you will notice they have been following
    Maduro's 'playbook'..

    get rid of the oponnents by
    any means necessary before the
    election, then...
    RIG the voting machines.


    Then shoot anyone who
    disputes election results.


    Anyone who disputes an election result is a TERROISTS, right?


    Domestic terroists.


    put an X on their door.

    drag them out of the house and shoot them!



    Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzlez, an escalation of the governments crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html


    Arrest Trump for disputing an election.


    4 more years in jail.



    Will the American people revolt then? That remains to be seen...



    dats less than 60 days.








    The Starmaker wrote:

    Okay, things are becoming clearer with recent events...

    as you already heard there is no X/twitter in Brazil (they turned it off)

    China OWNS BRAZIL!

    then elon post a picture of Kamala in a red china communist uniform...

    Kamala is a Chineese Communists. and her vice president been to
    China over 50 times, why?

    The Biden family is owned lock, stock and barrel by China.

    China OWNS BRAZIL! (China rigged Brazil elections)

    Answer: China decides who will win on November in USA elections.

    The goal of China is to be Head of a One World Govenment.

    (invented by albert einstein)

    anybody figured out how to get rid of those chink shows on Netflix?

    What i don't understand is why does China keep sending 'women' spies to top jobs in politics ..

    who wants to fuck a chink????

    Any chinks working in Wahington DC, ...GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!

    GO BACK TO FUCKIN CHINA!

    Won ton soup? WATDAFUCKISDAT????

    fishface

    What is the reason why God made people with slanted eyes?? IS HE FUCKING NUTS!!!!

    Is that a joke?

    Is he playing some kind of joke???

    "Look Mom, look at what I just made, fishfaces!"

    "Oh great, what are you going to do with the Black paint?"

    Maduro should come to the United States and run for President..he knows how to win elections.

    HE ALREADY SENT ALL HIS FUCKING PEOPLE HERE!!!!

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Of course, my Question is
    (and i don't know the answer)

    Who decides which way the
    Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
    are rigged for in the United States?

    Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.

    Someone gives the order.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.

    The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.

    In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.

    Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

    CIA?

    i don't know the answer.

    All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 8 23:15:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh


    Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzlez, an escalation of the governments crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html




    Venezuela's opposition figure flees to Spain to save 'his life'
    Venezuelan Leader Who Challenged Strongman in Vote Flees to Spain -
    WSJ
    Opposition candidate arrives in Spain after fleeing country - BBC
    Venezuela's opposition candidate flees to Spain


    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=venezuelan+leader+who+challenged+strongman+in+vote+flees+to+spain



    I guess the opponent factor got rigged too!


    'either leave or fuckin die!'


    Putin just throws his opponents out the widow! dat guy has style.

    Putin is what is called ...efficient.


    Learn to pronounce efficient
    /?'fiSH?nt/
    adjective
    (especially of a system or machine) achieving maximum productivity
    with minimum wasted effort or expense.

    adjective. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with
    the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite
    knowledge, skill, and industry..


    (the opposite of the democrats)

    they sure waste a lot of time and effort in the worst possible manner
    trying to get rid of Trump, right?


    Notice: no one mentions that Maduro used voting machines to rig the
    election. No ONE!


    dat means dats their plan too...


    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Sep 8 23:19:43 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What about that girl Maria??? Maria Corina Machado? is she next??



    The Starmaker wrote:


    Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzlez, an escalation of the governments crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html

    Venezuela's opposition figure flees to Spain to save 'his life'
    Venezuelan Leader Who Challenged Strongman in Vote Flees to Spain -
    WSJ
    Opposition candidate arrives in Spain after fleeing country - BBC
    Venezuela's opposition candidate flees to Spain

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=venezuelan+leader+who+challenged+strongman+in+vote+flees+to+spain

    I guess the opponent factor got rigged too!

    'either leave or fuckin die!'

    Putin just throws his opponents out the widow! dat guy has style.

    Putin is what is called ...efficient.

    Learn to pronounce efficient
    /?'fiSH?nt/
    adjective
    (especially of a system or machine) achieving maximum productivity
    with minimum wasted effort or expense.

    adjective. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with
    the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite
    knowledge, skill, and industry..

    (the opposite of the democrats)

    they sure waste a lot of time and effort in the worst possible manner
    trying to get rid of Trump, right?

    Notice: no one mentions that Maduro used voting machines to rig the
    election. No ONE!

    dat means dats their plan too...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 29 11:59:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    by 51, or by 52 percent?


    No way 100%, or
    90's
    80's
    70's
    60's...

    (maybe some other country)

    it has to be in the low 50's.

    wadda you think?

    59 sounds too high and
    unrealistic.

    58 i don't think so


    I say, not over 52. and not under 51.



    "It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

    The software does the counting.


    But it is very important that real people
    vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.



    Get out your hardhats! https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen



    there is an election coming...



    Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"



    didn't you hear, there is an election coming!


    Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
    all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.


    I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for


    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024



    Learn Grasshopper.



    52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?

    51 sounds just right.


    Not too hot, not too cold..just right.


    Goldenlocks knows best.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
    could have easily won '

    'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'

    But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
    Machines rigs the count.

    Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
    about it?"
    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    The more things change, the more they remain the same.

    On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!




    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
    disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse. >> > >>> > > >
    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >> > >>> > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along >> > >>> > > > identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as >> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain. >> > >>> > > >
    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on >> > >>> > > > questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.

    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
    information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >> > >>> > > >
    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false >> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Sep 29 22:36:36 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Gronk on Sun Sep 29 22:33:09 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Gronk wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    you forgot 6.

    6. Ukrainian hit squad.


    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Gronk on Sun Sep 29 23:05:02 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Gronk wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    Everybody knows Democrats can only count up to...5.

    (whether you use your right hand or your left hand or both, it counts only up to 5.)


    As you people probably already know...

    someone told Biden and Kamala Harris that half of the USA population has 'below average intelligence.' That's their audience they are trying to reach. That is why Kamal uses Baby Talk. BabyNonmics.

    In today's Wall Street Jorunal the Headline reads:

    "Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..."

    https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/nevada-election-swing-state-trump-harris-1cea51ed?mod=hp_lista_pos1


    a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in
    the U.S., a diploma from a high school : https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/non-graduate


    (people like Gronk who can only count up to 5)


    "Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..."
    a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in
    the U.S., a diploma from a high school :


    In other words, 3rd grade reading level adults.



    Run Spot Run.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Fri Oct 4 08:33:53 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Believe it or not...
    they are planning to Rig the voting machine
    to read number...57.




    On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:59:18 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    by 51, or by 52 percent?


    No way 100%, or
    90's
    80's
    70's
    60's...

    (maybe some other country)

    it has to be in the low 50's.

    wadda you think?

    59 sounds too high and
    unrealistic.

    58 i don't think so


    I say, not over 52. and not under 51.



    "It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

    The software does the counting.


    But it is very important that real people
    vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.



    Get out your hardhats! >https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen



    there is an election coming...



    Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"



    didn't you hear, there is an election coming!


    Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
    all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.


    I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for


    How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024



    Learn Grasshopper.



    52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?

    51 sounds just right.


    Not too hot, not too cold..just right.


    Goldenlocks knows best.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
    could have easily won '

    'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'

    But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
    Machines rigs the count.

    Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
    about it?"
    https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large

    The more things change, the more they remain the same.

    On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
    assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????


    I don't see any other 'option' that they have.


    I don't see any at all.

    do you?






    On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    By now you people should be able to SMELL
    that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????


    Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
    are now planning to cancel the upcoming
    2024 election...

    i think he is having fun.


    What kind of Americans are you?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w



    Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
    she's on the sixth floor
    Texas Library.

    and her daughter is on the phone...
    "I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"


    Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?


    I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!! >>> > >>



    (i don't think nancy can shoot straight)

    HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!



    election-rigging at it's best!





    The Starmaker wrote:

    I mean, don't you people think that if
    Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up >>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
    *cancel* the election"????

    Are you people not prepared for this??

    That's the plan.

    The plan is to *cancel* the election.

    In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.

    for "technical reasons"...

    one can come up with
    thousands of reasons..
    like fabricate that all the
    voting machines have been tampered with, etc.

    election delayed is election denied.

    BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!

    It's called...'election manipulation'....
    interfering with the election process.

    or

    "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker

    throwing your
    oppenents
    out the window is
    'election manipulation'.

    It is a..coup d'etat.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
    any other hurdles...'they' can always..

    delay the election day for "technical reasons"..

    election delayed is election denied.

    Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"

    Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"

    Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024

    Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
    is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    Paul Kagame is the MAN!

    (read about his opponents)

    How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html

    https://archive.ph/vFYH0

    He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
    his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!

    one million of them in 90 days!

    dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.

    he no need no stinky usb stick.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?

    I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?

    I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.

    I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
    the same dead people who voted in the last election will
    be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?

    Do dead people vote by mail or do they
    stuffing ballot boxes at night?

    Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
    there are...
    1.8 million.

    How To Rig an Election, Again!

    Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
    eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
    may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
    polling place accessibility.

    Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
    to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a >>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
    principle of equal representation.

    Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
    or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
    voters or exclude legitimate ones.

    Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
    violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
    candidate or party.

    Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
    favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
    reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.

    Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
    voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
    based on informed choice.

    Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
    confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
    in voting.

    Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
    systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
    online to influence public opinion.

    Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
    funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
    party.

    Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
    others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.

    Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
    the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
    electorate.

    Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
    campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
    to gain an unfair advantage.

    Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
    independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
    play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.

    Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
    positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
    decision-making and compromised election administration.

    Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
    to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.

    Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
    campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.

    Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
    mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots. >>> > >>> > > >
    Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
    between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
    identity lines.

    Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
    strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
    scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.

    Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
    that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
    engage in questionable practices.

    Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
    through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
    public opinion and sway voters.

    Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
    certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
    and strategically alter the electoral landscape.

    Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or >>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
    the legitimacy of the process.

    Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
    including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
    fraudulent postal votes.

    Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
    favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
    long wait times in areas that are less supportive.

    Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
    to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
    disinformation campaigns, or financial support.

    Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
    target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
    field.

    Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
    administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
    questionable grounds.

    Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
    parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.

    Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
    a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters. >>> > >>> > > >
    Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
    election to undermine its legitimacy.

    Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
    are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
    impartiality of the electoral process.

    Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
    nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
    opponents.

    Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete >>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
    issues, or the electoral process.

    Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
    reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results. >>> > >>> > > >
    Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
    election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
    systems.

    Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
    bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
    manipulate online discussions.

    Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
    to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
    demographics.

    Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
    voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
    in favor of a particular candidate or party.

    Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
    debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
    candidate or party.

    Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
    forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
    discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.

    Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
    resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
    support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.

    Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
    positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
    to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.

    Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
    particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
    to the perceived majority opinion.

    Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
    civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
    voter attitudes.

    Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
    opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
    strategies.

    Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
    presence of international election observers to create a false >>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.

    Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
    critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
    gain a tactical advantage.

    Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
    uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
    using financial markets as a tool.

    Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
    issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
    discourse, and influence voter priorities.


    i almost forgot...a USB stick.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, >>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Oct 6 23:39:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Gronk wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    you forgot 6.

    6. Ukrainian hit squad.

    7. "Russia - if you're listening"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Oct 6 23:38:31 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Believe it or not...
    they are planning to Rig the voting machine
    to read number...57.

    Quick! You must get to Gotham City and
    warn Commissioner Gordon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sun Oct 6 23:40:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:
    Gronk wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:
    The Question of course is...
    what NUMBER
    will the Democrats decide to
    rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting Machine????

    1. bamboo ballots

    2. magic thermostats

    3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

    4. HUGO CHAVEZ

    5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

    Everybody knows Democrats can only count up to...5.

    Everyone knows republicons can't count at all!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Sat Oct 19 23:27:53 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148



    On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 10:26:06 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

    Antonio Mugica Rivero
    Born May 1974
    Caracas, Venezuela
    Alma mater Universidad Simn Bolvar
    Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic


    It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
    Voting machines!!!!

    It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

    Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting >machines to never lose an election.


    Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.



    The software is programmed to never lose an election.


    Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)



    I love loaded dice too! (i play strip dice with girls)


    When you tell a girl, "Let's play strip poker!!!!" and she
    smiles...you're in like flint! get your marked deck out!!!


    of course, she'll get a little angry when she notices all her clothes
    are off and yours are still on...

    she'll say..."WHAT KIND OF FUCKING CARDS DO YOU GOT???!"



    How about dice?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Tue Oct 22 10:52:00 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148


    That means after the election...there will be war.


    WAR!

    blood in the streets


    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.


    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.


    so the beat goes on...






    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue Oct 22 12:39:57 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    YOU'RE NEXT!!!!





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 23 07:55:28 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Oct 23 00:29:30 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.


    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Wed Oct 23 00:22:53 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Thomas Heger wrote:

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH


    verb

    make a hole or holes in.
    synonyms: puncture, make a hole in, perforate, pierce, penetrate, rupture, spike, stab, split, slit, rent, lacerate, gash, gore



    The blood had to come from a hole...

    the bullet cut his ear...


    laceration, cut, slash, tear, gouge, puncture, score, incision, slit, split, rip, rent, nick, cleft, scratch, scrape, graze, abrasion, wound, injury, lesion, contusion, trauma, traumatism



    blood comes out from a hole.

    the bullet graze the ear.

    It is all synonyms


    synonym
    /'sin??nim/
    noun
    a word or phrase that means exactly or nearly the same as another word or phrase in the same language









    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 23 05:29:30 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In article <lnrhe7Fi3p0U1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH

    So what are you saying? It was a set up? Careful now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Wed Oct 23 08:15:11 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In sci.physics Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
    In article <lnrhe7Fi3p0U1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH

    So what are you saying? It was a set up? Careful now.

    What he is saying is that in looking at a picture of a bullet wound, he
    can not tell the difference between a through-and-through wound and a
    graze wound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Wed Oct 23 11:11:04 2024
    In article <tggnuk-jlfq.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>, jimp@gonzo.specsol.net
    says...

    In sci.physics Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
    In article <lnrhe7Fi3p0U1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they >> > are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH

    So what are you saying? It was a set up? Careful now.

    What he is saying is that in looking at a picture of a bullet wound, he
    can not tell the difference between a through-and-through wound and a
    graze wound.

    So he's an idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed Oct 23 12:41:23 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now, I'm going to tell you who is going to win the election on Nov 5th...


    Kamala Harris!



    All of the voting machines are rigged!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148


    ALL OF THEM!



    Just as Maduro has confidence that he won his election
    (no matter what his mother says)

    the Democrats have the same confidence they will
    win...(they control the voting machines that do the counting)

    (they are both using the same source code)

    If I'm playing strip poker with a
    bunch of girls...
    there is no way I'm playing without a marked deck!


    I WANT THOSE GIRLS ...NAKED!!!!


    and i get to keep all my clothes on...




    Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024



    How to rig stip poker.


    What happens when girls see you with all your clothes on and they are naked????

    They beging to suspect something is ...fishy.

    They begin to have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at the cards...


    Trump voters are going to
    have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at those Dominion Voting Machines.


    They ask the Democrats, "Is that machine rigged???"


    The Democrats respond with...


    "YOU GOT THE FUCKING NERVE TO ASK THE QUESTION!!!!!"


    TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!!




    Maduro sez, "Oh fucking shoot them!"







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.

    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Oct 23 20:47:53 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:15:11 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
    In article <lnrhe7Fi3p0U1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Dienstag000022, 22.10.2024 um 21:39 schrieb The Starmaker:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they >>>> > are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit >>>> by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH

    So what are you saying? It was a set up? Careful now.

    What he is saying is that in looking at a picture of a bullet wound, he
    can not tell the difference between a through-and-through wound and a
    graze wound.


    He's speaking to another of Trump's exaggerations though not a particularly worrying one.


    Got a reference to what he actually said, was it literally "through" or
    some other word?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 24 10:21:44 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Am Mittwoch000023, 23.10.2024 um 09:22 schrieb The Starmaker:

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they
    are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH


    verb

    make a hole or holes in.
    synonyms: puncture, make a hole in, perforate, pierce, penetrate, rupture, spike, stab, split, slit, rent, lacerate, gash, gore



    The blood had to come from a hole...

    the bullet cut his ear...

    Sure, but where was the hole a few days later????

    If there was no hole, than there was not wound a few days earlier,
    because shot-wounds do not heal that fast.


    Therefore, it is a reasonable assumption, that Trump received no shot at
    all.

    But if so, then were did the blood came from???


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 24 07:42:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In article <lnuecdF7p4U5@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Mittwoch000023, 23.10.2024 um 09:22 schrieb The Starmaker:

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...


    Strange to see millions of people standing on a line to vote as if they >>> are going to pick up their...pods.


    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was hit
    by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.

    TH


    verb

    make a hole or holes in.
    synonyms: puncture, make a hole in, perforate, pierce, penetrate, rupture, spike, stab, split, slit, rent, lacerate, gash, gore



    The blood had to come from a hole...

    the bullet cut his ear...

    Sure, but where was the hole a few days later????

    If there was no hole, than there was not wound a few days earlier,
    because shot-wounds do not heal that fast.


    Therefore, it is a reasonable assumption, that Trump received no shot at
    all.

    But if so, then were did the blood came from???

    and why did people die?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 25 08:45:34 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was
    hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face
    under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of
    human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even
    lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Fri Oct 25 04:34:00 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Thomas Heger wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's
    ear a few days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he
    was hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his
    face under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and
    the objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red
    blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard
    tails attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the
    shape of human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because
    even lizzards don't recover that fast.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Sky:_The_Coming_Race

    The plot follows a group of nuclear holocaust survivors living in
    an abandoned Nazi base on the far side of the Moon. Boarding a barely-functioning spacecraft, they travel to the nucleus of the
    hollow Earth in an attempt to recover the Holy Grail from a group
    of reptilian shape-shifters who are led by Tyrannosaurus-riding
    Adolf Hitler.


    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 25 07:25:13 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was
    hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face
    under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of
    human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even
    lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Oct 25 09:29:25 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In Washington, DC.. they are already ordering the ...tanks.





    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, I'm going to tell you who is going to win the election on Nov 5th...

    Kamala Harris!

    All of the voting machines are rigged!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    ALL OF THEM!

    Just as Maduro has confidence that he won his election
    (no matter what his mother says)

    the Democrats have the same confidence they will
    win...(they control the voting machines that do the counting)

    (they are both using the same source code)

    If I'm playing strip poker with a
    bunch of girls...
    there is no way I'm playing without a marked deck!

    I WANT THOSE GIRLS ...NAKED!!!!

    and i get to keep all my clothes on...

    Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    How to rig stip poker.

    What happens when girls see you with all your clothes on and they are naked????

    They beging to suspect something is ...fishy.

    They begin to have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at the cards...

    Trump voters are going to
    have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at those Dominion Voting Machines.

    They ask the Democrats, "Is that machine rigged???"

    The Democrats respond with...

    "YOU GOT THE FUCKING NERVE TO ASK THE QUESTION!!!!!"

    TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!!

    Maduro sez, "Oh fucking shoot them!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.

    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Sat Oct 26 00:41:02 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Washington, DC practically will be a ghost town by election day!

    Everybody in Washington, DC knows all those Dominion voting machines are rigged to the hilt...

    probably Kamala Harris will receive more votes in counties than voters that exist there!


    If the word gets out I'll have a problem finding girls to play strip poker with me...

    "Hey Honey, wanna play strip poker with me?"

    she sez: "Why don't I just take off all my clothes now?"

    i sez: "Oh come on, there is no fun in that!"



    The Starmaker wrote:

    In Washington, DC.. they are already ordering the ...tanks.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, I'm going to tell you who is going to win the election on Nov 5th...

    Kamala Harris!

    All of the voting machines are rigged!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    ALL OF THEM!

    Just as Maduro has confidence that he won his election
    (no matter what his mother says)

    the Democrats have the same confidence they will
    win...(they control the voting machines that do the counting)

    (they are both using the same source code)

    If I'm playing strip poker with a
    bunch of girls...
    there is no way I'm playing without a marked deck!

    I WANT THOSE GIRLS ...NAKED!!!!

    and i get to keep all my clothes on...

    Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

    How to rig stip poker.

    What happens when girls see you with all your clothes on and they are naked????

    They beging to suspect something is ...fishy.

    They begin to have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at the cards...

    Trump voters are going to
    have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at those Dominion Voting Machines.

    They ask the Democrats, "Is that machine rigged???"

    The Democrats respond with...

    "YOU GOT THE FUCKING NERVE TO ASK THE QUESTION!!!!!"

    TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!!

    Maduro sez, "Oh fucking shoot them!"

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.

    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 26 11:26:18 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was
    hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face
    under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails
    attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of
    human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even
    lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a
    hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.


    TH


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Thomas Heger on Sat Oct 26 07:26:45 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was
    hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face
    under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood. >>>
    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails >>> attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of
    human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even
    lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a
    hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury
    a graze wound can be.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 26 18:30:16 2024
    W dniu 26.10.2024 o 16:26, Jim Pennino pisze:
    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says...

    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was >>>>>> hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face
    under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood. >>>>
    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails >>>> attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of
    human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even
    lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he
    survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a
    hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury
    a graze wound can be.




    - It's not just me and my idiot guru saying!
    It's MUONS!!! And EXPERIMENTS!!! And the
    overwhelming majority saying!!!!!

    - but experiments can't speak and the
    overwhelming majority is not even aware
    of your idiocies...

    - UUUU!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!! UUUUUUUUUU!!!!
    PLONK!!!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sat Oct 26 20:57:25 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:26:45 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says... >>>>>
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>>>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was >>>>>>> hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face >>>>>> under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood. >>>>>
    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails >>>>> attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of >>>>> human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even >>>>> lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he
    survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a
    hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury
    a graze wound can be.


    The part that surprised me was that after the bandage came off a couple of days
    later, there was no scab.


    So you examined both sides of Trump's ear?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sat Oct 26 21:00:18 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:26:45 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says... >>>>>
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few >>>>>>> days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was >>>>>>> hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face >>>>>> under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the
    objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood. >>>>>
    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails >>>>> attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of >>>>> human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even >>>>> lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he
    survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a
    hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury
    a graze wound can be.


    That was a lot of blood for a wound that was completely gone in four days.


    On just about any part of the ear other than the lobe, a small scratch
    will bleed a lot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Oct 27 13:01:04 2024
    Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:57:25 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:26:45 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says... >>>>>>>
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was >>>>>>>>> hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face >>>>>>>> under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the >>>>>>>> objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails
    attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of >>>>>>> human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even >>>>>>> lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he >>>>> survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a >>>>> hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury >>>>a graze wound can be.


    The part that surprised me was that after the bandage came off a couple of days
    later, there was no scab.


    So you examined both sides of Trump's ear?

    So the bullet went *around* Trump's ear grazing only the back side? Then turned
    again and went on to strike another victim?

    Are you insane or does the simple fact that there is ample room for a
    bullet to pass between the back of the ear, or graze the back of the
    ear, without touching the skull elude you?

    Actually, I have no idea exactly where Trump was wounded or how bad the
    wound was, but it would appear that neither do you and you are pulling
    crap out your ass.


    This is why people think Trump supporters are stupid.

    Because you are.


    Sounding like TDS to me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Sun Oct 27 13:02:54 2024
    Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 21:00:18 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 07:26:45 -0700, Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> wrote:

    In sci.physics Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 15:25 schrieb Skeeter:
    In article <lo0t42Fc9drU1@mid.individual.net>, ttt_heg@web.de says... >>>>>>>
    Am Freitag000025, 25.10.2024 um 06:08 schrieb Physfitfreak:
    On 10/23/24 00:55, Thomas Heger wrote:
    The only thing strange was the missing shot-wound in Trump's ear a few
    days after the shot.

    He said in an interview on the day of the assasination, that he was >>>>>>>>> hit by a shot through his right ear.

    But a few days later, there was no hole anymore.


    His ears must be like lizards' tails. In fact if you place his face >>>>>>>> under a microscope but switch the positions of eyepiece and the >>>>>>>> objective lenses, you'd see a lizard's face there.


    As far as I know lizzards have no ears (at least no earlobes).

    And human ears also don't look similar to lizzard tails.

    Lets think of: Possibly Trump is actually a lizzard.

    But in that case he had no earlobes and (as far as I know) no red blood.

    A more theoretical possibility would be: he could have had lizzard tails
    attatched to his head, which were secretly morphed into the shape of >>>>>>> human ears.

    But still he would have shot wounds (~four days later), because even >>>>>>> lizzards don't recover that fast.



    TH

    So are you saying it's fake? Even though people died?

    No, not a real fake.

    It was (apparently) ment to give super-hero status to Trump, because he >>>>> survived an assassination.

    But where is the shot-wound, anyhow?

    Possibly there was a double involved and there exist somebody with a >>>>> hole in his earlobe, which looks very much like Trump.

    Possibly you are simply incapable of understanding what a minor injury >>>>a graze wound can be.


    That was a lot of blood for a wound that was completely gone in four days. >>>

    On just about any part of the ear other than the lobe, a small scratch
    will bleed a lot.


    Sure. That's why when you get your ears pierced they have to a blood bag standing by for transfusion, just in case.

    So what part of "other than the lobe" did you not understand?

    Sounding more and more like TDS...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Fri Nov 1 22:47:27 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Here is another rigged voting machine

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1852135057651036365


    You click Trump, it automatically switches to Kamala...


    at least the rig works!


    dat is what it is designed to do.



    On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:41:23 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Now, I'm going to tell you who is going to win the election on Nov 5th...


    Kamala Harris!



    All of the voting machines are rigged!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148


    ALL OF THEM!



    Just as Maduro has confidence that he won his election
    (no matter what his mother says)

    the Democrats have the same confidence they will
    win...(they control the voting machines that do the counting)

    (they are both using the same source code)

    If I'm playing strip poker with a
    bunch of girls...
    there is no way I'm playing without a marked deck!


    I WANT THOSE GIRLS ...NAKED!!!!


    and i get to keep all my clothes on...




    Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024



    How to rig stip poker.


    What happens when girls see you with all your clothes on and they are naked????

    They beging to suspect something is ...fishy.

    They begin to have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at the cards...


    Trump voters are going to
    have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at those Dominion Voting Machines.


    They ask the Democrats, "Is that machine rigged???"


    The Democrats respond with...


    "YOU GOT THE FUCKING NERVE TO ASK THE QUESTION!!!!!"


    TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!!




    Maduro sez, "Oh fucking shoot them!"







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.

    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Fri Nov 1 22:55:37 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Now here is a real stupid question..

    since ALL the voting machines are
    rigged to switch votes from
    Trump to Kamala
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1852135057651036365

    Who is going to win the election?






    On Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:47:27 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Here is another rigged voting machine

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1852135057651036365


    You click Trump, it automatically switches to Kamala...


    at least the rig works!


    dat is what it is designed to do.



    On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:41:23 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Now, I'm going to tell you who is going to win the election on Nov 5th...


    Kamala Harris!



    All of the voting machines are rigged!

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148


    ALL OF THEM!



    Just as Maduro has confidence that he won his election
    (no matter what his mother says)

    the Democrats have the same confidence they will
    win...(they control the voting machines that do the counting)

    (they are both using the same source code)

    If I'm playing strip poker with a
    bunch of girls...
    there is no way I'm playing without a marked deck!


    I WANT THOSE GIRLS ...NAKED!!!!


    and i get to keep all my clothes on...




    Re: How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024



    How to rig stip poker.


    What happens when girls see you with all your clothes on and they are naked????

    They beging to suspect something is ...fishy.

    They begin to have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at the cards...


    Trump voters are going to
    have mean looks on their faces and they
    start staring at those Dominion Voting Machines.


    They ask the Democrats, "Is that machine rigged???"


    The Democrats respond with...


    "YOU GOT THE FUCKING NERVE TO ASK THE QUESTION!!!!!"


    TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!! TERROISTS!!!




    Maduro sez, "Oh fucking shoot them!"







    The Starmaker wrote:

    Now, after the election
    with both sides making
    plans for the future...
    there are two
    possible futures.

    But only one future will happen.

    I'm betting the election will be 'cannceled', no matter who wins.

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Physfitfreak wrote:

    On 10/20/24 01:27, The Starmaker wrote:
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148




    She's got more Neanderthal in her than Iranian dick.

    Kind of a cro-magnons' cro-magnon.

    what SHE is trying to convey is that the government is rigging the
    votting machines, and
    that the only ones that can put a stop to that is NOT anyone in
    Government, but 'the people' themselves.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148

    That means after the election...there will be war.

    WAR!

    blood in the streets

    When Trump was shot, his first words were...FIGHT!

    He looked to the people and said...fight, fight, fight.

    All the voting machines are all already...rigged. And I don't see
    anybody taking them out.

    so the beat goes on...

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.
    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to starmaker@ix.netcom.com on Sat Nov 2 01:16:15 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On Fri, 01 Nov 2024 22:55:37 -0700, The Starmaker
    <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

    Now here is a real stupid question..

    since ALL the voting machines are
    rigged to switch votes from
    Trump to Kamala
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1852135057651036365

    Who is going to win the election?


    Of course, there are people out there saying...

    "No way are those voting machines rigged!"


    its a psychological defense mechanism in which confrontation with a
    with reality is avoided by denying the existence of the reality



    "Never underestimate the power of denial"



    https://twitter.com/i/status/1852135057651036365



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
    the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 10 21:57:06 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    What do you suppose the Democrats in the Biden Adminstration are up to
    now????

    I keep seeing now in the news...

    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!

    and then...POW! and the democrats will say...


    "I told you so!"

    when all it is is a setup...

    'election interference'.


    Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration????


    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!

    no, the democrats want to kill trump.


    and of course
    point the finger
    at iran.


    iran is the fall guy.



    Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration????


    Let's see how many times they will continue with...



    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!


    in the news headlines.








    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Nov 15 08:42:46 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In today's WSJ the Headline reads:

    EXCLUSIVE
    MIDDLE EAST

    Iran Told U.S. It Wouldnt Try to Kill Trump

    https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-told-u-s-it-wasnt-trying-to-kill-trump-c2d8267d?mod=hp_lead_pos6

    In other words, Iran is saying..."WE ARE NOT TRYING TO KILL TRUMP. IT'S YOU FUCKING GUYS WHO ARE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP!!!!"


    Nancy Pelosi is probably buying ak-47's from iran...


    Why don't Iran simply say..."IT'S NANCY PELOSI AND CHUCK SHULMER AND THE FUCKING CIA WHO ARE TRYING TO KILL TRUMP!!!"



    Tell Iran give us some names...


    Robert DeNiro?


    Whoopi Goldberg??




    I tell you, put all these democrats in concentration camps...I'll handle the food problem.

    "Let them eat grass"







    The Starmaker wrote:

    What do you suppose the Democrats in the Biden Adminstration are up to now????

    I keep seeing now in the news...

    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!

    and then...POW! and the democrats will say...

    "I told you so!"

    when all it is is a setup...

    'election interference'.

    Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration????

    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!

    no, the democrats want to kill trump.

    and of course
    point the finger
    at iran.

    iran is the fall guy.

    Are 'they' betting he won't make it to..Inauguration????

    Let's see how many times they will continue with...

    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!
    IRAN WANTS TO KILL TRUMP!!!

    in the news headlines.



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)