• Re: At Motion BH. Atom's motion aligning to light's absolute

    From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 11 13:23:00 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    If the atom can compete with light's absolute
    it shows it has an absolute motion of its own
    competing...

    Just more of your typical, incoherent, babbling nonsense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Mon Feb 12 08:40:59 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sunday, February 11, 2024 at 1:31:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    If the atom can compete with light's absolute
    it shows it has an absolute motion of its own
    competing...
    Just more of your typical, incoherent, babbling nonsense.

    Can science measure a difference between the absolute and the relative
    to prove it? There is a reason to not believe in relative.
    The stars can't really change in their distance.
    Only by their local orbits that are not relatives.
    The universe has an absolute expanding size
    always.

    The Earth moves in more than one way.
    Your world line shares the Earth's turn and
    the Earth's orbit. Those days and year are not relatives.
    Time dilation and kinetic energies are absolute quantities.
    Absolute motion obeys the speed limit
    but two frames obeying the speed limit can converge above c and
    below 2c.

    If atoms can compete with light and light converges
    at 2c they can do the same.


    And yet another giant steaming pile of confused, ignorant, incoherent,
    word salad, idiotic babbling gibberish from the resident moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)