How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
You don't have to rig it! It comes rigged right out the box!!
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.
Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!
It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.
Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
The software is programmed to never lose an election.
Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)
Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder
Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption
and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024,
related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the
Philippines.
Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along
with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice
president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.
Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola,
founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was
chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s
voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that
it had divested its stake in that company.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme
https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/
I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING
RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???
You fuckin let them run it????
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????
Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!
I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!
Where can I buy one?
Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and
contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...
"Okay, add another million votes."
The source code is probably 20 years old and hasn't been updated.
Why fix it if it is not broken? Maduro is a happy customer.
Where can I buy one?
I like the fact no one is allowed to look 'inside' the voting machine
or look at the source code.
I'll buy two of them.
The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????
by 51, or by 52 percent?
No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...
(maybe some other country)
it has to be in the low 50's.
wadda you think?
59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.
58 i don't think so
I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
The software does the counting.
But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
The machine doesn't work unless you
get stupid people to vote..
Run, Spot, Run.
If you want to know what
stupid people look like...
watch them standing on line to vote.
They even dress like stupid people!
Are they ...zombies?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Oh, here is the 'source code' and Dominion Voting Machine up and ready
out of the box!
https://codepen.io/rdetert/pen/KKMEbOZ
How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
You don't have to rig it! It comes rigged right out the box!!
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.
Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!
It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.
Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
The software is programmed to never lose an election.
Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)
Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder
Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption
and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024,
related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the
Philippines.
Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along
with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice
president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.
Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola,
founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was
chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s
voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that
it had divested its stake in that company.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme
https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/
I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING
RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???
You fuckin let them run it????
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????
Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!
I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!
Where can I buy one?
Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and
contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...
"Okay, add another million votes."
The source code is probably 20 years old and hasn't been updated.
Why fix it if it is not broken? Maduro is a happy customer.
Where can I buy one?
I like the fact no one is allowed to look 'inside' the voting machine
or look at the source code.
I'll buy two of them.
The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????
by 51, or by 52 percent?
No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...
(maybe some other country)
it has to be in the low 50's.
wadda you think?
59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.
58 i don't think so
I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
The software does the counting.
But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
The machine doesn't work unless you
get stupid people to vote..
Run, Spot, Run.
If you want to know what
stupid people look like...
watch them standing on line to vote.
They even dress like stupid people!
Are they ...zombies?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
If you are not allowed
to inspect
a voting machine...
how do you know if it has been hacked or not????
The Starmaker wrote:
Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like after Nov 5th...:
Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook
Objective:
To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
process.
Actors:
Political Party (Democrats)
Voting Machine Manufacturer
Timeline & Actions:
Preparation Phase
Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.
Election Day
Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time vote counts.
Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with the targeted voting machines.
Execution Phase
Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.
Post-Election Audit
Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election results.
Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes for Trump.
Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the voting machines.
Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.
Disruption Phase
Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.
Aftermath
Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
investigation into the tampering claims.
Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and political fallout.
Contingency Plans:
Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent claims.
Conclusion:
By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
cancellation.
The Starmaker wrote:
How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
You don't have to rig it! It comes rigged right out the box!!
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.
Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!
It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.
Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
The software is programmed to never lose an election.
Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)
Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder
Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.
Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.
Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme
https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/
I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???
You fuckin let them run it????
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????
Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!
I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!
Where can I buy one?
Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...
"Okay, add another million votes."
The source code is probably 20 years old and hasn't been updated.
Why fix it if it is not broken? Maduro is a happy customer.
Where can I buy one?
I like the fact no one is allowed to look 'inside' the voting machine
or look at the source code.
I'll buy two of them.
The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????
by 51, or by 52 percent?
No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...
(maybe some other country)
it has to be in the low 50's.
wadda you think?
59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.
58 i don't think so
I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
The software does the counting.
But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
The machine doesn't work unless you
get stupid people to vote..
Run, Spot, Run.
If you want to know what
stupid people look like...
watch them standing on line to vote.
They even dress like stupid people!
Are they ...zombies?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like after Nov 5th...:
Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook
Objective:
To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election
process.
Actors:
Political Party (Democrats)
Voting Machine Manufacturer
Timeline & Actions:
Preparation Phase
Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.
Election Day
Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time
vote counts.
Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with
the targeted voting machines.
Execution Phase
Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and
leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.
Post-Election Audit
Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election
results.
Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes
for Trump.
Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the
voting machines.
Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to
match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.
Disruption Phase
Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public
outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the
election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.
Aftermath
Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent
investigation into the tampering claims.
Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to
ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and
political fallout.
Contingency Plans:
Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any
whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle
any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent
claims.
Conclusion:
By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or
cancellation.
The Starmaker wrote:
How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
You don't have to rig it! It comes rigged right out the box!!
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.
Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!
It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.
Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
The software is programmed to never lose an election.
Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)
Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder
Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption
and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024,
related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the
Philippines.
Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.
Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s
voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that
it had divested its stake in that company.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme
https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/
I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING
RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???
You fuckin let them run it????
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????
Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!
I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!
Where can I buy one?
Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...
"Okay, add another million votes."
The source code is probably 20 years old and hasn't been updated.
Why fix it if it is not broken? Maduro is a happy customer.
Where can I buy one?
I like the fact no one is allowed to look 'inside' the voting machine
or look at the source code.
I'll buy two of them.
The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????
by 51, or by 52 percent?
No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...
(maybe some other country)
it has to be in the low 50's.
wadda you think?
59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.
58 i don't think so
I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
The software does the counting.
But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
The machine doesn't work unless you
get stupid people to vote..
Run, Spot, Run.
If you want to know what
stupid people look like...
watch them standing on line to vote.
They even dress like stupid people!
Are they ...zombies?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
But after a municipal primary election in Chicago in March, Sequoia
voting machines were blamed for a series of delays and irregularities. Smartmatic’s new president, Jack A. Blaine, acknowledged in a public
hearing that Smartmatic workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help
with the vote.
Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software
component, which transmits the voting results to a central computer,
that was developed in Venezuela.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
The Starmaker wrote:
If you are not allowed
to inspect
a voting machine...
how do you know if it has been hacked or not????
The Starmaker wrote:
Here is what the Democrats Playbook would look like after Nov 5th...:
Democrats Election Manipulation Playbook
Objective:
To manipulate election results by adding fraudulent votes to a specific candidate and subsequently claim tampering to disrupt the election process.
Actors:
Political Party (Democrats)
Voting Machine Manufacturer
Timeline & Actions:
Preparation Phase
Identify Target Machines: Select specific voting machines to be manipulated.
Develop Manipulation Software: Create software to add fraudulent votes using a USB stick.
Train Operatives: Ensure trusted operatives are trained on how
to use the USB sticks and manipulate the voting machines.
Election Day
Monitor Voter Turnout: Keep track of voter turnout and real-time vote counts.
Deploy Operatives: Position operatives at polling locations with the targeted voting machines.
Execution Phase
Timing: Wait until near the end of the election day when polling locations are less crowded and Trump looks like a clear winner.
Rig the Machines: Insert the USB sticks into the targeted voting machines and add 2 million fraudulent votes for Trump.
Ensure Plausible Deniability: Operatives must be discreet and leave no trace of tampering by erasing the USB stick after the election.
Post-Election Audit
Demand an Audit: Call for an immediate audit of the election results.
Highlight Discrepancies: Focus on the 2 million additional votes for Trump.
Claim Tampering: Publicly claim that someone tampered with the voting machines.
Provide "Proof": Use the audit results showing the inability to match the additional 2 million votes as evidence of tampering.
Disruption Phase
Create Public Outcry: Mobilize media and social media to amplify claims of tampering.
Push for Postponement: Use the alleged tampering and public outcry to call for postponing or canceling the election.
Legal Maneuvers: Initiate legal proceedings to challenge the election results based on the fraudulent votes and tampering claims.
Aftermath
Investigate Allegations: Advocate for an independent investigation into the tampering claims.
Control the Narrative: Maintain control of the narrative to ensure public perception favors the postponement or cancellation.
Prepare for Contingencies: Be ready for potential legal and political fallout.
Contingency Plans:
Exposure Risk: Have a contingency plan to discredit any whistleblowers or evidence that might expose the collusion.
Public Backlash: Be prepared with a robust PR strategy to manage any public backlash and maintain credibility.
Legal Challenges: Ensure a team of legal experts is ready to handle any legal challenges that arise from the manipulation and subsequent claims.
Conclusion:
By meticulously executing this playbook, the aim is to manipulate the election results in a way that adds fraudulent votes to Trump, and then leverage the resulting discrepancies to claim tampering, ultimately disrupting the election process and forcing a postponement or cancellation.
The Starmaker wrote:
How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
You don't have to rig it! It comes rigged right out the box!!
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.
Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!
It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.
Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
The software is programmed to never lose an election.
Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)
Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder
Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.
Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along
with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.
Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme
https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/
I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???
You fuckin let them run it????
WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????
Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!
I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!
Where can I buy one?
Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...
"Okay, add another million votes."
The source code is probably 20 years old and hasn't been updated.
Why fix it if it is not broken? Maduro is a happy customer.
Where can I buy one?
I like the fact no one is allowed to look 'inside' the voting machine or look at the source code.
I'll buy two of them.
The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????
by 51, or by 52 percent?
No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...
(maybe some other country)
it has to be in the low 50's.
wadda you think?
59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.
58 i don't think so
I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
The software does the counting.
But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
The machine doesn't work unless you
get stupid people to vote..
Run, Spot, Run.
If you want to know what
stupid people look like...
watch them standing on line to vote.
They even dress like stupid people!
Are they ...zombies?
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
The Starmaker wrote:
But after a municipal primary election in Chicago in March, Sequoia
voting machines were blamed for a series of delays and irregularities.
Smartmatic’s new president, Jack A. Blaine, acknowledged in a public
hearing that Smartmatic workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help
with the vote.
"...workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help
with the vote."????
Is the source code in...Spanish??? no habla ingles?
it should read: "...Venezuelian gangsters had been flown up from
Venezuela to help
with the rigging."
Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software
component, which transmits the voting results to a central computer,
that was developed in Venezuela.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
"...transmits the voting results to a central computer..."
then the gangsters transmits back with an additional million votes to
the government gangsters.
...
Am Samstag000012, 12.10.2024 um 21:45 schrieb The Starmaker:
The Starmaker wrote:
But after a municipal primary election in Chicago in March, Sequoia
voting machines were blamed for a series of delays and irregularities.
Smartmatic’s new president, Jack A. Blaine, acknowledged in a public
hearing that Smartmatic workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help >> with the vote.
"...workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help
with the vote."????
Is the source code in...Spanish??? no habla ingles?
it should read: "...Venezuelian gangsters had been flown up from
Venezuela to help
with the rigging."
Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software
component, which transmits the voting results to a central computer,
that was developed in Venezuela.
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
"...transmits the voting results to a central computer..."
then the gangsters transmits back with an additional million votes to
the government gangsters.
...
('gangster' is a little too tough.)
But what if Obama was actually from Indonesia?( What I personally think
is true).
Couldn't the next president be from Venezuela??
Trump is seemingly from Germany and had at least German ancestors.
But why can't the Americans have an own candidate?
TH
How To Rig a Dominion Voting Machine
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 09:08:32 +0200, Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> wrote:
But what if Obama was actually from Indonesia?( What I personally think
is true).
Oh! So, you're an idiot! Why would you think anybody on Usenet care what an idiot thinks?
U.S. Investigates Voting Machines’ Venezuela Ties
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
The federal government is investigating the takeover last year of a
leading American manufacturer of electronic voting systems by a small software company that has been linked to the leftist Venezuelan
government of President Hugo Chávez.
The inquiry is focusing on the Venezuelan owners of the software
company, the Smartmatic Corporation, and is trying to determine whether
the government in Caracas has any control or influence over the firm’s operations, government officials and others familiar with the
investigation said.
The inquiry on the eve of the midterm elections is being conducted by
the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or Cfius, the
same panel of 12 government agencies that reviewed the abortive attempt
by a company in Dubai to take over operations at six American ports
earlier this year.
The committee’s formal inquiry into Smartmatic and its subsidiary,
Sequoia Voting Systems of Oakland, Calif., was first reported Saturday
in The Miami Herald.
Officials of both Smartmatic and the Venezuelan government strongly
denied yesterday that President Chávez’s administration, which has been bitterly at odds with Washington, has any role in Smartmatic.
“The government of Venezuela doesn’t have anything to do with the
company aside from contracting it for our electoral process,” the
Venezuelan ambassador in Washington, Bernardo Alvarez, said last night.
Smartmatic was a little-known firm with no experience in voting
technology before it was chosen by the Venezuelan authorities to replace
the country’s elections machinery ahead of a contentious referendum that confirmed Mr. Chávez as president in August 2004.
Seven months before that voting contract was awarded, a Venezuelan
government financing agency invested more than $200,000 into a smaller technology company, owned by some of the same people as Smartmatic, that joined with Smartmatic as a minor partner in the bid.
In return, the government agency was given a 28 percent stake in the
smaller company and a seat on its board, which was occupied by a senior government official who had previously advised Mr. Chávez on elections technology. But Venezuelan officials later insisted that the money was
merely a small-business loan and that it was repaid before the
referendum.
With a windfall of some $120 million from its first three contracts with Venezuela, Smartmatic then bought the much larger and more established Sequoia Voting Systems, which now has voting equipment installed in 17
states and the District of Columbia.
Since its takeover by Smartmatic in March 2005, Sequoia has worked aggressively to market its voting machines in Latin America and other developing countries. “The goal is to create the world’s leader in
electronic voting solutions,” said Mitch Stoller, a company spokesman.
But the role of the young Venezuelan engineers who founded Smartmatic
has become less visible in public documents as the company has been restructured into an elaborate web of offshore companies and foreign
trusts.
“The government should know who owns our voting machines; that is a
national security concern,” said Representative Carolyn B. Maloney,
Democrat of New York, who asked the Bush administration in May to review
the Sequoia takeover.
“There seems to have been an obvious effort to obscure the ownership of
the company,” Ms. Maloney said of Smartmatic in a telephone interview yesterday. “The Cfius process, if it is moving forward, can determine
that.”
The concern over Smartmatic’s purchase of Sequoia comes amid rising
unease about the security of touch-screen voting machines and other electronic elections systems.
Government officials familiar with the Smartmatic inquiry said they
doubted that even if the Chávez government was some kind of secret
partner in the company, it would try to influence elections in the
United States. But some of them speculated that the purchase of Sequoia
could help Smartmatic sell its products in Latin America and other
developing countries, where safeguards against fraud are weaker.
A spokeswoman for the Treasury Department, which oversees the foreign investment committee, said she could not comment on whether the panel
was conducting a formal investigation.
“Cfius has been in contact with the company,” said the spokeswoman,
Brookly McLaughlin, citing discussions that were first disclosed in
July. “It is important that the process is conducted in a professional
and nonpolitical manner.”
The committee has wide authority to review foreign investments in the
United States that might have national security implications. In
practice, though, it has focused mainly on foreign acquisitions of
defense companies and other investments in traditional security realms.
Since the political furor over the Dubai ports deal, members of Congress
from both parties have sought to widen the purview of such reviews to incorporate other emerging national security concerns.
In late July, the House and the Senate overwhelmingly approved
legislation to expand the committee’s scope, give a greater role to the office of the director of national intelligence and strengthen
Congressional oversight of the review process.
But the Bush administration opposed major changes, and Congressional
leaders did not act to reconcile the two bills before Congress
adjourned.
Foreigners seeking to buy American companies in areas like defense manufacturing typically seek the committee’s review themselves before
going ahead with a purchase. Legal experts said it would be highly
unusual for the panel to investigate a transaction like the Sequoia
takeover, and even more unusual for the panel to try to nullify the transaction so long after it was completed.
It is unclear, moreover, what the government would need to uncover about
the Sequoia sale to take such an action.
The investment committee’s review typically involves an initial 30-day examination of any transactions that might pose a threat to national security, including a collective assessment from the intelligence
community. Should concerns remain, one of the agencies involved can
request an additional and more rigorous 45-day investigation.
In the case of the ports deal, the transaction was approved by the
investment committee. But the Dubai company later abandoned the deal, agreeing to sell out to an American company after a barrage of criticism
by legislators from both parties who said the administration had not adequately reviewed the deal or informed Congress about its
implications.
The concerns about possible ties between the owners of Smartmatic and
the Chávez government have been well known to United States
foreign-policy officials since before the 2004 recall election in which
Mr. Chávez, a strong ally of President Fidel Castro of Cuba, won by an official margin of nearly 20 percent.
Opposition leaders asserted that the balloting had been rigged. But a statistical analysis of the distribution of the vote by American experts
in electronic voting security showed that the result did not fit the
pattern of irregularities that the opposition had claimed.
At the same time, the official audit of the vote by the Venezuelan
election authorities was badly flawed, one of the American experts said. “They did it all wrong,” one of the authors of the study, Avi Rubin, a professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins University, said in an interview.
Opposition members of Venezuela’s electoral council had also protested
that they were excluded from the bidding process in which Smartmatic and
a smaller company, the Bizta Corporation, were selected to replace a
$120 million system that had been built by Election Systems and Software
of Omaha.
Smartmatic was then a fledgling technology start-up. Its registered
address was the Boca Raton, Fla., home of the father of one of the two
young Venezuelan engineers who were its principal officers, Antonio
Mugica and Alfredo Anzola, and it had a one-room office with a single secretary.
The company claimed to have only two going ventures, small contracts for secure communications software that a Smartmatic spokesman said had a
total value of about $2 million.
At that point, Bizta amounted to even less. Company documents, first
reported in 2004 by The Herald, showed the firm to be virtually dormant
until it received the $200,000 investment from a fund controlled by the Venezuelan Finance Ministry, which took a 28 percent stake in return.
Weeks before Bizta and Smartmatic won the referendum contract, the
government also placed a senior official of the Science Ministry, Omar Montilla, on Bizta’s board, alongside Mr. Mugica and Mr. Anzola. Mr. Montilla, The Herald reported, had acted as an adviser to Mr. Chávez on elections technology.
More recent corporate documents show that before and after Smartmatic’s purchase of Sequoia from a British-owned firm, the company was
reorganized in an array of holding companies based in Delaware
(Smartmatic International), the Netherlands (Smartmatic International Holding, B.V.), and Curaçao (Smartmatic International Group, N.V.). The firm’s ownership was further shielded in two Curaçao trusts.
Mr. Stoller, the Smartmatic spokesman, said that the reorganization was
done simply to help expand the company’s international operations, and
that it had not tried to hide its ownership, which he said was more than
75 percent in the hands of Mr. Mugica and his family.
“No foreign government or entity, including Venezuela, has ever held any stake in Smartmatic,” Mr. Stoller said. “Smartmatic has always been a privately held company, and despite that, we’ve been fully transparent
about the ownership of the corporation.”
Mr. Stoller emphasized that Bizta was a separate company and said the
shares the Venezuelan government received in it were “the guarantee for
a loan.”
Mr. Stoller also described concerns about the security of Sequoia’s electronic systems as unfounded, given their certification by federal
and state election agencies.
But after a municipal primary election in Chicago in March, Sequoia
voting machines were blamed for a series of delays and irregularities. Smartmatic’s new president, Jack A. Blaine, acknowledged in a public
hearing that Smartmatic workers had been flown up from Venezuela to help
with the vote.
Some problems with the election were later blamed on a software
component, which transmits the voting results to a central computer,
that was developed in Venezuela.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
This just in...
Reports from Whitfield County, GA that Dominion machines are flipping votes.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1847361255415460148
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 475 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 145:51:31 |
Calls: | 9,477 |
Calls today: | 8 |
Files: | 13,610 |
Messages: | 6,120,522 |