Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 5:03:41 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Why did Hawking go on existing?
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
Am Freitag000004, 04.04.2025 um 07:24 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 5:03:41 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Why did Hawking go on existing?
I had actually a theory about that, too.
My guess:
Hawking didn't use his 'eye controlled speech synthesizer' himself.
That was actually done by 'remote control' as was his wheel chair.
His own role in that was just to sit there and look ugly.
TH
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosphy (bother)
to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being ...rational.
put on a dress, some lipstick and walk the streets at night.
leave your panties home.
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote:
Stephen Hawking once asked:
Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
If Stephen Hawking would like an answer
to that question, has he ever consider
asking a woman that question?
I don't mean a woman scientist..
i mean, just any woman.
Where did Stephen Hawking get the idea he is
entitled to know the answer?
Is he Moses?
I was under the impression that Stephen Hawking was an atheist.
But he refers to the universe as a person, a being, a self that feels "bother"..
Why is Stephen Hawking soooo bothered by a bothered universe?
Mother Nature?
Is something bothering her?
Yous science guys make no sense...
It appears that both Einstein and Hawking are using Philosphy (bother)
to try
to understand the universe...
and that the universe is some hot and bothered irrational woman.
Yous science people are certaintly not going to get the answers by being ...rational.
I mean, I observe the Earth and it doesn't appear rational to me....
doesn't that ...bother...you?
Using rational means in a irrational world sounds STUPID to me.
Luckly, only a small percentage of the people on earth are rational.
There is NO scientific basis for a rational world...
but there is a scientific basis for a irratio[nal*] world.
On 4/10/25 2:20 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
The Universe is not an evolved biologcal system.
Jan
How do you know that? How can one state that as fact without having the
means to check it?
What does 'exist' mean? Why suppose that it was ever possible for
nothing to exist?
On 04/09/2025 07:21 AM, Richmond wrote:
What does 'exist' mean? Why suppose that it was ever possible for
nothing to exist?
Well it can follow from consideration or contemplation/deliberation
itself: on the universal, vis-a-vis the void, that there are examples
since antiquity like 'nature abhors a vacuum', about creation and
destruction vis-a-vis conservation, that considering "nothing" is
the same as considering "everything".
It's sort of like when a given thing, is, everything that it is not.
Then, this gets into things like why there's a principle of inversion
instead of a principle of (non-)contradiction, that's sort of been
a usual idea since antiquity, the principle of non-contradiction,
yet instead, a principle of inversion can see that arrive and
for reason and rationality and according to nature and reality.
So, really it's a question to answer for yourself, where though
the usual "fundamental question of metaphysics" is "why is there
something rather than nothing", then there's quite a bit of the
canon and dogma and doctrine about it, to make inter-subjective
accounts, vis-a-vis, usual personal individual ponderings.
Anyways there's an idea that the universe exists simply because
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 475 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 146:21:00 |
| Calls: | 9,477 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 13,610 |
| Messages: | 6,120,606 |