The Blinding Light of Overhype
Isaac Newton’s Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica is often
heralded as the pinnacle of intellectual achievement, as if its mere
existence single-handedly flung humanity out of the Dark Ages and into
the glorious light of scientific progress. The truth, however, is far
less flattering. Yes, the Principia formalized the laws of motion and
universal gravitation, but let’s not pretend Newton came down from Mount Olympus with truths engraved on stone tablets. He built upon ideas painstakingly developed by others—Kepler, Galileo, and Descartes, to
name a few. Yet, in true Newtonian fashion, his ego managed to eclipse
theirs entirely, leaving them as little more than footnotes in his story
of supposed genius.

The Calculus Conundrum
And let’s talk about calculus, shall we? Because if there’s anything
more infuriating than Newton’s obsessive need for credit, it’s his
bitter feud with Leibniz over who invented it. The Principia, while groundbreaking, drips with Newton’s habit of encoding his findings in
obscure geometric methods, almost as if he were trying to make himself indispensable to the scientific elite. He could’ve leveraged the
calculus he worked so hard to develop, but no—he locked it behind layers
of unnecessary complexity, turning what should have been a triumph of
clarity into an academic power play. Brilliant? Sure. Benevolent? Hardly.

Unforgiving Genius, Relentless Obscurity
Reading the Principia is less like beholding a masterpiece and more like
wading through molasses while being lectured by an unsympathetic genius
who refuses to simplify anything for mere mortals. Newton had no
interest in making his work accessible—he wasn’t writing for humanity;
he was writing for posterity. His dense, Latin-filled prose and
labyrinthine diagrams are the antithesis of user-friendliness, ensuring
that only the most dedicated scholars could decipher his findings.
Perhaps that’s why it became so revered—it’s easier to idolize something you don’t understand than to admit it might just be intentionally inscrutable.

Conclusion
And if Newton’s Principia wasn’t enough of a monument to his
insufferable arrogance, let’s not forget his later years—when the
so-called ‘father of modern science’ turned into a glorified
executioner. Yes, our dear Isaac, the man who supposedly unlocked the
secrets of the universe, spent his twilight years gleefully hunting down forgers and sending them to the gallows. Imagine it: Newton, perched in
the shadows, watching as the trapdoor swung open and necks snapped, all
in the name of justice. Justice? No, this was entertainment for him—a grotesque spectacle that families, children in tow, would gather to
watch as if it were a carnival. And Newton? He wasn’t just a bystander;
he was the architect of their doom, wielding his power with the same
cold precision he used to calculate the motion of planets.
"This is the man we revere? A man who could unravel the mysteries of the
cosmos but found equal satisfaction in the crack of a noose? The
Principia may have changed the world, but its author was no hero. He was
a man who hoarded knowledge, crushed rivals, and, in his later years,
turned his intellect toward the grim machinery of death. So yes,
Newton’s legacy is undeniable, but let’s not pretend it’s unblemished. His genius was as dark as it was brilliant, and the Principia stands as
both a triumph of human intellect and a chilling reminder of the man who
wrote it. A man who, for all his brilliance, seemed to find as much joy
in the gallows as he did in the stars.


...I figured this would bring a smile to some of your faces...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically worthless
paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in counterfeiting.
Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their
wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 08/04/2025 07:28, Bertitaylor (the Hindoo dog) wrote:

Arindam, your post is a reply to someone else's post, judging by the
"Re:..." in the Subject field.

The fact that you cannot even respond to someone else's post without eliminating the original poster's ID and context casts a severe doubt on
your ability and understanding of the nature of things.

Learn to use Usenet forums correctly. And don't bark unless you are
spoken to.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Down boy!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 6:33:55 +0000, occam wrote:

On 08/04/2025 07:28, Bertitaylor (the Hindoo dog) wrote:

Tch tch, Arindam should make a time machine to transport such bigots to
the Dark Ages, where they rightly belong.

Arindam, your post is a reply to someone else's post, judging by the
"Re:..." in the Subject field.

Well, nice to see you have sufficient wit to work that out, ape.
You are evolving, although you have far to go before you ascend the
lowest rung of caninity.

The fact that you cannot even respond to someone else's post without eliminating the original poster's ID and context casts a severe doubt on
your ability and understanding of the nature of things.

No worries, ape. Scurrilous matter from putrid ape-minds need not be
given much attention. But they do exist, and should be made use of, to
point out what is what to the apes. About how low the ape-mind can sink.

What matters is what we posted, about why Sir Isaac Newton's greatness
extends beyond physics.

Not that we expect much gratitude from uncivilised apes like you, but
being canine has its obligations, what. We gotta make you apes better
apes. Doggies' burden; must be borne, with majestically waving tail.

To get back to the top of forgeries, let us go back a few centuries
before Newton. To Mohammad bin Tughluq, of the Delhi Sultanate. A
brilliant person, he had the idea of introducing base coinage as a
substitute for the noble coin. He knew that extraordinary benefits, of
the kind enjoyed now by everyone, would ensue. Alas, he was many
centuries ahead of his time. Rampant counterfeiting took place, and the
whole thing was a fiasco. Now, if he had someone like Sir Isaac Newton
to help him with the whole money business, making counterfeiting
difficult or impossible, then wow he would have made extraordinary
gains.

Learn to use Usenet forums correctly. And don't bark unless you are
spoken to.

Any ape with more wits than you could find out the original article from
the newgroups mentioned. To do you justice, you do have some minimum
courage, as you have not killfiled us as Moylan and others have. Yet,
behave, unless you want to be a howler monkey in your next birth.

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdoggies, doing propaganda work
for him)

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 8:36:59 +0000, bertitaylor wrote:

On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 6:33:55 +0000, occam wrote:

On 08/04/2025 07:28, Bertitaylor (the Hindoo dog) wrote:

Tch tch, Arindam should make a time machine to transport such bigots to
the Dark Ages, where they rightly belong.

Arindam, your post is a reply to someone else's post, judging by the
"Re:..." in the Subject field.

Well, nice to see you have sufficient wit to work that out, ape.
You are evolving, although you have far to go before you ascend the
lowest rung of caninity.

The fact that you cannot even respond to someone else's post without
eliminating the original poster's ID and context casts a severe doubt on
your ability and understanding of the nature of things.

No worries, ape. Scurrilous matter from putrid ape-minds need not be
given much attention. But they do exist, and should be made use of, to
point out what is what to the apes. About how low the ape-mind can sink.

What matters is what we posted, about why Sir Isaac Newton's greatness extends beyond physics.

Not that we expect much gratitude from uncivilised apes like you, but
being canine has its obligations, what. We gotta make you apes better
apes. Doggies' burden; must be borne, with majestically waving tail.

To get back to the top

woof woof, should be topic instead of top. Apologies, apes.



of forgeries, let us go back a few centuries

before Newton. To Mohammad bin Tughluq, of the Delhi Sultanate. A
brilliant person, he had the idea of introducing base coinage as a
substitute for the noble coin. He knew that extraordinary benefits, of
the kind enjoyed now by everyone, would ensue. Alas, he was many
centuries ahead of his time. Rampant counterfeiting took place, and the
whole thing was a fiasco. Now, if he had someone like Sir Isaac Newton
to help him with the whole money business, making counterfeiting
difficult or impossible, then wow he would have made extraordinary
gains.

It does not pay to be so far ahead of your time. Whether Sultan Mohammed
bin Tughluq was a madman or a genius is debated to this day. Bet the
white apes here never heard of him., woof woof.

Learn to use Usenet forums correctly. And don't bark unless you are
spoken to.

Any ape with more wits than you could find out the original article from
the newgroups mentioned. To do you justice, you do have some minimum
courage, as you have not killfiled us as Moylan and others have. Yet,
behave, unless you want to be a howler monkey in your next birth.

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdoggies, doing propaganda work
for him)

--

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically worthless paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in counterfeiting. Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Le 10/04/2025 à 06:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

He was a mere lightweight. He weighed only one Newton (0.225 lbf).

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically worthless
paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in counterfeiting.
Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their
wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are
naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to
materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Le 10/04/2025 à 11:42, Ross Clark a écrit :

On 10/04/2025 8:22 p.m., Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically
worthless
paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense >>>> and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible >>>> was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that >>>> money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in
counterfeiting.
Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug
gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their >>>> wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are >>>> naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to
materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber
imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Internet Profile?
Intimate Parts??!?

Good question. I'm intrigued by 'previous metals'.

Still it's good that Bertie is doggedly studying English.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 10/04/2025 8:22 p.m., Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically worthless >>> paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in counterfeiting. >>> Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug gold >>> and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their
wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are
naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

Internet Profile?
Intimate Parts??!?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:47:45 +0000, Hibou wrote:

Le 10/04/2025 à 11:42, Ross Clark a écrit :

On 10/04/2025 8:22 p.m., Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically
worthless
paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense >>>>> and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible >>>>> was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that >>>>> money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the >>>>> goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in
counterfeiting.
Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug
gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their >>>>> wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are >>>>> naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity. >>>>

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from >>>> other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to
materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber
imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Internet Profile?
Intimate Parts??!?

Good question. I'm intrigued by 'previous metals'.

Still it's good that Bertie is doggedly studying English.

You apes can learn English from Arindam, the best.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:42:51 +0000, Ross Clark wrote:

On 10/04/2025 8:22 p.m., Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically worthless >>>> paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense >>>> and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible >>>> was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that >>>> money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in counterfeiting. >>>> Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug gold >>>> and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their >>>> wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are >>>> naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to
materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber
imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

Internet Profile?

https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359/

Intimate Parts??!?

Revising physics:

The cause of gravity https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

Supreme English literature: https://www.amazon.com.au/Son-Hiranyaksh-Ancient-Valour-Demons/dp/147528599X

PLEASE DO NOT BUY THIS BOOK FROM THE THIEF AMAZON. READ IT IN ARINDAM'S FACEBOOK TIMELINE IN 2019 WITH ANNOTATIONS. ARINDAM HAS NOT GOT A CENT
FROM AMAZON WHEN RIGHT NOW IT IS SELLING FOR $38 WHEN STIPULATIED PRICE
SHOULD BE $10.

fROM THE SITE

Very old tales relating to Indian mythology are narrated in this book.
The popularity of these tales, that have lasted for many centuries, and
will never be forgotten, is certainly time-tested! They can be read as
racy fantasy fiction with appeal for everyone; or as the most
thought-provoking epic stories showing up the universal truths searched
for by men over ages. The author has carefully reconstructed the diverse versions of the ancient tales with his research efforts over the last 15
years. He seeks to present what they meant to Indians two or three
thousand years ago. They are now clearly and concisely integrated with
inspired insight, and presented in an attractive, highly readable style
with modern flourishes. These classic stories deal with valour, romance, mystery, magic, duty; by reading them we may find out how much they have
shaped our minds about the deepest moral issues over thousands of years, spanning national boundaries. The eternal conflicts between the
principled Gods and the opportunistic Demons form the main interest. In
this book, they effectively come out of our minds and take shapes and
desires of their own! The demon-hero Andhak, is the protagonist in the
main story. Born blind and ugly, out of his mother's impulse and
father's pain, he is discarded by them for adoption by Hiranyaksh, the demon-king. Andhak is horribly treated by his cousins after his adoptive father's death in battle against the Gods. With great effort he
overcomes his limitations, and fights the Gods, seeking vengeance... An
excerpt follows: Hiranyaksh, the Asura king, was doing severe penances
to propitiate Shiva. Such was his prayer: "O Shiva, greatest of Devas,
do hear my prayer and grant me this boon! I have no wish for
immortality; I do not wish to be any Deva, eternally bound to principles
and ideals. I am happy to be just what I am: an Asura, a demon driven by passion and ego, delighting in opulence and fame and revelries. By Your
grace, I already possess vast might, large armies, incredible wealth -
so much that we are now about to challenge the Devas. "O Shiva, there is
no one higher among us Asuras to pray to, than myself. Only to You, the
very greatest Deva, the most principled, indeed the very best among
Them, most certainly the most powerful - only to You can I pray, for You
are the most superior among all entities. From You I beseech a boon.
"Shiva, do cast Your favourable eye upon me. Be kind to me. You know
that although I am an Asura I am still accessible to Your grace. Forget
the squabbles we have to have with the lesser Devas. Those selfish and
uncaring hypocrites, aloof and joyless; those moral snobs, pursuing cold
and lonely habits; are a natural affront to our senses of equality and gregarious living. They deserve chastisement from time to time. "O
Shiva, we Asuras are nothing without passion. Most passionately, I want
a son. My brother Hiranyakshap, he has four strong sons. I don't want
any of them to inherit my kingdom. I want my own son to rule the Asuras.
Of all the Asuras, he must be the bravest and the strongest - he must
dominate all. All must be in fear and awe of him. "Shiva, give me such a
son."

woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 4/10/25 01:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically

worthless

paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in

counterfeiting.

Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug

gold

and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their
wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are
naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

Bombarding mercury 196 with neutrons to get gold 197 might
technically be 'nuclear physics' and not 'chemistry', but
if you start talking about 'base metal' than maybe that
could be 'alchemy'.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:11:12 +0000, x wrote:

On 4/10/25 01:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically

worthless

paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means

immense

and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was

possible

was to make copying impossible or very difficult.

Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion

that

money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with

the

goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in

counterfeiting.

Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug

gold

and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as

their

wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk

are

naturally wealthy.

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of

humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold

from

other metals.

Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold

out

of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

Bombarding mercury 196 with neutrons to get gold 197 might
technically be 'nuclear physics' and not 'chemistry', but
if you start talking about 'base metal' than maybe that
could be 'alchemy'.

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it with
high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and stars,
will work to solve energy problems.

Simple, what? Like Arindam's one line derivation of his mass energy relationship, the basis for future physics.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to materials.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the elites of their time.

Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP; following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber imperatives.

Woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Am Donnerstag000010, 10.04.2025 um 10:54 schrieb Hibou:

Le 10/04/2025 à 06:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold
from other metals.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

He was a mere lightweight. He weighed only one Newton (0.225 lbf).

There exists a theory, that Shakespeare and Newton didn't write what
they were famous for.

They simply borrowed their names for sinister plots.


Newtons 'Principia' were not written more or less at the end of Newton's
life, but in the middle.

This was quite astonishing, since Newton wrote about occultism and
alchemy later and not about physics.

But why?

I mean: you had just written the most influential book in physics of
your entire era and then you stop????

Usually scientific careers have 'momentum' and once in full swing, you
cannot simply stop.

But Newton did just that and after 'Principia' he studied the art of
making Gold and the influence of the stars upon the course of life.

That was a VERY odd succession!


TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 4:44:28 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Donnerstag000010, 10.04.2025 um 10:54 schrieb Hibou:

Le 10/04/2025 à 06:51, Thomas Heger a écrit :

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.

As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold
from other metals.

So, in a way he was a forger himself.

But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
(similar to Shakespeare).

He was a mere lightweight. He weighed only one Newton (0.225 lbf).

There exists a theory, that Shakespeare and Newton didn't write what
they were famous for.

When lies need respectability, the liars call them theories. Examples
abound - from big bang theory to black hole theory with thermodynamics, relativity and quantum in between.

They simply borrowed their names for sinister plots.

Wow, they must have made the ruling bigots and their present descendants unhappy.

Newtons 'Principia' were not written more or less at the end of Newton's life, but in the middle.

Just as Arindam wrote his book "To the stars!" in 1999, when he was
middle aged. In that book he laid the basis for future physics, updating Newton's laws of motion, with his new formula relating matter and energy
on a kinetic non-destructive anti-inertia basis.

This was quite astonishing, since Newton wrote about occultism and
alchemy later and not about physics.

After revising physics, Arindam turned to metaphysics involving Arya
mythology. He wrote the supreme work of English literature "The Son of Hiranyaksh". Now, that is totally different from physics!

But why?

What could Newton do? His colleagues were pigheaded Aristotleans who
were hostile to his new ideas. Just as Arindam currently faces total
hostility from the Einsteinians (who are essentially Aristotleans out to
please the funding fundies who adore Aristotle, as they want the Earth
to remain the centre of their small universe).

I mean: you had just written the most influential book in physics of
your entire era and then you stop????

Other things to do, see. Not much more can be done in your field, for
your new revolutionary outlook, when all around who are influential are
stone cold to your new ideas.
In time, when the old fools die out, and new uses are found for new
physics, there is scope. But not just after. Newton was trying to keep
himself away from outright physical harm from the Aristotle/Einstein
class bigots (the type who had burned Bruno at the stake).
Similarly Arindam is now at last getting some traction for his future
physics, what with the regressive old fools slowly fading from the
scene. eg, whodat of sci.physics fame.

Usually scientific careers have 'momentum' and once in full swing, you
cannot simply stop.

Ah, here we have it. You have used the magic word "career". No careerist depending upon wages and lusting for fames and awards would have
stopped. Yes. But Newton was not a careerist. He was a hobbyist, like
Arindam. Like Arindam he was a loner, who worked with his hands, made
his own models, as that was the most efficient way to go.

But Newton did just that and after 'Principia' he studied the art of
making Gold and the influence of the stars upon the course of life.

He did try to stretch the boundaries of his knowledge. You need not
always go in the most productive direction.

Finally he got a good job in the Mint and a decent salary at last. Then
he laid the basis for the modern economy we enjoy today, and will do so,
for ever and aye. By stopping forgery, and thus making all the moeny in
the world, converting labour and materials into gold, effectively, via unforgeable paper and now twists in cyblerspace!

That was a VERY odd succession!

Not from Arindam's point of view, but then, the ways of the greatest
geniuses cannot be understood by mediocre opportunist careerists.

Woof woof woof woof

Bertietaylor

TH

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 05:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:11:12 +0000, x wrote:

On 4/10/25 01:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
;

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically

worthless

paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means

immense

and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was

possible

was to make copying impossible or very difficult.
;
Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion

that

money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with

the

goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in

counterfeiting.

Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug

gold

and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as

their

wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk

are

naturally wealthy.
;
Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of

humanity.

;
As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold

from

other metals.

;
Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold

out

of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

Bombarding mercury 196 with neutrons to get gold 197 might
technically be 'nuclear physics' and not 'chemistry', but
if you start talking about 'base metal' than maybe that
could be 'alchemy'.

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it with
high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and stars,
will work to solve energy problems.

Simple, what? Like Arindam's one line derivation of his mass energy relationship, the basis for future physics.

...

I personally think, that the so called 'standard model' (aka 'particle concept') is wrong.

I think, that matter is not composed from particles, but that particles
are 'timelike stable patterns'.

As 'proof of concept' I wanted to use 'Growing Earth' (which I regard as correct).

The idea behind my arguments:
I needed an example, which invalidates the so called 'great
materialistic meta-paradigm', what 'Growing Earth' would do.

...

TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.usage.english

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 6:33:05 +0000, occam wrote:

On 12/04/2025 01:15, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:52:07 +0000, occam wrote:

On 11/04/2025 14:51, Hibou wrote:

Le 11/04/2025 à 10:18, bertitaylor a écrit :

We are but Arindam's dead dogs barking from low Heaven, where we
romp in
glee. In our mortal states we learnt some English from Arindam. Arindam >>>>> creates the most splendid English prose

Could we see a sample, please?

<Woof, woof, woof, woof> . Surely that would be familiar to you by now.
It's the only sensible thing he writes.

That is the only thing the Occam entity can understand.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

No Arindam. I also understand that beneath your twisted Hindu
personality of a failed & bitter physicist, there is a secret Englishman ('BertiTaylor') who can only express itself as a mad dog. Those Jesuit priests have a lot to answer for.

First try to be a good ape. Stop following and telling lies. Then you
may ascend the lowest rungs of caninity.

As things are you are set to become a howler monkey in your next birth.

Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof


Y<woof, woof.>

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 8:29:58 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 05:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:11:12 +0000, x wrote:

On 4/10/25 01:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
;

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically

worthless

paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means

immense

and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was

possible

was to make copying impossible or very difficult.
;
Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion >>> that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with

the

goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in

counterfeiting.

Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug >>> gold
and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as

their

wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk >>> are
naturally wealthy.
;
Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of

humanity.

;
As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold

from

other metals.

;
Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold

out

of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

Bombarding mercury 196 with neutrons to get gold 197 might
technically be 'nuclear physics' and not 'chemistry', but
if you start talking about 'base metal' than maybe that
could be 'alchemy'.

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it with
high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and stars,
will work to solve energy problems.

Simple, what? Like Arindam's one line derivation of his mass energy
relationship, the basis for future physics.

....

I personally think, that the so called 'standard model' (aka 'particle concept') is wrong.

The proton and the electron are mobile realisations of aether, formed
from the force of life, that is eternal, infinite, ever present. Call
them particles or whatever, they are the most fundamental force for
repulsion and attraction.

I think, that matter is not composed from particles, but that particles
are 'timelike stable patterns'.

Arindam thinks of them as concepts so everything material or mass is an aggregation of concepts.

As 'proof of concept' I wanted to use 'Growing Earth' (which I regard as correct).

A cell grows with life force, divides and in that division multiplies.
Where do the extra electrons and protons come from?

So much we do not know. But if we are all concepts or ideas much as
electronic money or video then somehow we can transport suavely
elsewhere.

The idea behind my arguments:
I needed an example, which invalidates the so called 'great
materialistic meta-paradigm', what 'Growing Earth' would do.

Consider cells from above.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof

....

TH

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.usage.english

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 20:20:42 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

On 12/04/2025 06:48, Hibou wrote:

Le 11/04/2025 à 22:33, Bertitaylor a écrit :

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:51:15 +0000, Hibou wrote:

Le 11/04/2025 à 10:18, bertitaylor a écrit :

We are but Arindam's dead dogs barking from low Heaven, where we
romp in
glee. In our mortal states we learnt some English from Arindam. Arindam >>>>>> creates the most splendid English prose [...]

Could we see a sample, please?

Search and ye shall find.

All his prose is matchless. Like his astounding physics which the full >>>> and corrupt world has yet to grasp.

He invented blogging with his "Picaresque tales of an Indian
publicsectorman".

His wonderful lyrics have no equal.

Point is, he writes for the good of future generations

<Laugh>

I am reminded of the phrase:
"If you can't be a good example, you can be an awful warning."
I see him doing sterling work in that latter category.

A similar Dutch nautical proverb says that:
'Een schip op het strand is een baken op zee'
(lit. a ship on the beach is a beacon at sea)

Tagore song:
Aami shudhu ackla neyay
Aamar shunni nyay

I am the sole sailor
If my sole ship

(Exploring unknown oceans)

Arindam will sing that when he will try out his new rowing method
(patented).

So not just a sterling example, he is getting nowhere,

Not a slur in our present world run by liars, thieves, fools, sluts,
etc. Arindam does not belong in their company.

To have the mandate of Heaven suffices. All Arindam wants is to do
better in Their eyes.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

Jan

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.usage.english

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 22:12:39 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 20:20:42 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

On 12/04/2025 06:48, Hibou wrote:

Le 11/04/2025 à 22:33, Bertitaylor a écrit :

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:51:15 +0000, Hibou wrote:

Le 11/04/2025 à 10:18, bertitaylor a écrit :

We are but Arindam's dead dogs barking from low Heaven, where we >>>>>>> romp in
glee. In our mortal states we learnt some English from Arindam. Arindam >>>>>>> creates the most splendid English prose [...]

Could we see a sample, please?

Search and ye shall find.

All his prose is matchless. Like his astounding physics which the full >>>>> and corrupt world has yet to grasp.

He invented blogging with his "Picaresque tales of an Indian
publicsectorman".

His wonderful lyrics have no equal.

Point is, he writes for the good of future generations

<Laugh>

I am reminded of the phrase:
"If you can't be a good example, you can be an awful warning."
I see him doing sterling work in that latter category.

A similar Dutch nautical proverb says that:
'Een schip op het strand is een baken op zee'
(lit. a ship on the beach is a beacon at sea)

Tagore song:
Aami shudhu ackla neyay
Aamar shunni nyay

I am the sole sailor
If my sole ship

Tch tch

OF my sole ship

Regrets, woof woof, autocorrect is a pain.

(Exploring unknown oceans)

Arindam will sing that when he will try out his new rowing method
(patented).

So not just a sterling example, he is getting nowhere,

Not a slur in our present world run by liars, thieves, fools, sluts,
etc. Arindam does not belong in their company.

To have the mandate of Heaven suffices. All Arindam wants is to do
better in Their eyes.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

Jan

--

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 15:59 schrieb Bertitaylor:

On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 8:29:58 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:

Am Freitag000011, 11.04.2025 um 05:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:11:12 +0000, x wrote:

On 4/10/25 01:22, Bertitaylor wrote:

On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
;

Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:

Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern >>>>  >>> finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically

worthless

paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means

immense

and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was

possible

was to make copying impossible or very difficult.
;
Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion >>>> that
money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with >>>> the
goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in

counterfeiting.

Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to

lug
gold

and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as >>>> their
wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful

folk
are

naturally wealthy.
;
Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of

humanity.

;
As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold >>>> from
other metals.

;
Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold >>>> out
of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.

Bombarding mercury 196 with neutrons to get gold 197 might
technically be 'nuclear physics' and not 'chemistry', but
if you start talking about 'base metal' than maybe that
could be 'alchemy'.

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it with
high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and stars,
will work to solve energy problems.

Simple, what? Like Arindam's one line derivation of his mass energy
relationship, the basis for future physics.

....

I personally think, that the so called 'standard model' (aka 'particle
concept') is wrong.

The proton and the electron are mobile realisations of aether, formed
from the force of life, that is eternal, infinite, ever present. Call
them particles or whatever, they are the most fundamental force for
repulsion and attraction.

I think, that matter is not composed from particles, but that particles
are 'timelike stable patterns'.

Arindam thinks of them as concepts so everything material or mass is an aggregation of concepts.

As 'proof of concept' I wanted to use 'Growing Earth' (which I regard as
correct).

A cell grows with life force, divides and in that division multiplies.
Where do the extra electrons and protons come from?

I wanted to prove, that there are no real particles, but 'timelike
stable structures'.

Therefore matter could pop out of nowhere and vanish into nothing.

The 'pop out of nowhere' case would be 'Growing Earth'.
(also: 'big-bang' or 'magic dust').

The 'vanish into nothing' case has also a famous example: 9/11.
...


TH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever
fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

--
Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 8:15:14 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

Wrong as ever, Moylan.
As e = mcc is a bogus formula it is useful to frauds and SciFi for money making.
It does not explain solar energy.
From Arindam's physics energy or rather em radiation meaning em force is continuously created by the sun and stars on a kinetic basis. No need
for e=mcc when the laws of thermodynamics are thrown out.
E=0.5mvvN(N-k) rules
Check his links where he has described his future physics in detail.
And stop telling lies. Grow up.

Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 13/04/2025 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if
E=mc^2 ever
fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy
equivalence.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if they
ever come to depend upon fission? Stars depend critically upon
fusion.

--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 13/04/2025 at 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

Or indeed if we ever manage to recite the 9 billion names of God (which
God? you may ask.)


--
Chris Elvidge, England
SHERRI DOES NOT "GOT BACK"

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 13/04/25 19:50, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 13/04/2025 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding
it with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun
and stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2
ever fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy
equivalence.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if they
ever come to depend upon fission? Stars depend critically upon
fusion.

Oops. I swear I had fusion in mind when I wrote that, but my fingers
must have had a different opinion.

--
Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 13/04/25 21:11, Chris Elvidge wrote:

On 13/04/2025 at 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever
fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

Or indeed if we ever manage to recite the 9 billion names of God (which
God? you may ask.)

The one whose name is Legion.

--
Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On 13/04/2025 11:54, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 13/04/25 19:50, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 13/04/2025 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding
it with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the
sun
and stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if
E=mc^2
ever fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy
equivalence.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if they
ever come to depend upon fission? Stars depend critically upon
fusion.

Oops. I swear I had fusion in mind when I wrote that, but my fingers
must have had a different opinion.

You've earned one of these.
________ ________
/ `--' \
/___| |___\
| MY TYPO WAS |
| STELLAR BUT |
| ALL I GOT |
| WAS THIS |
| LOUSY |
| T-SHIRT |
|______________|


--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> wrote:

On 13/04/2025 at 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

Or indeed if we ever manage to recite the 9 billion names of God (which
God? you may ask.)

All of them of course,

Jan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity, alt.usage.english

On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:01:46 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> wrote:

On 13/04/2025 at 09:15, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 11/04/25 13:57, Bertitaylor wrote:

Pushing protons past neutrons to get deuterium, then bombarding it
with high energy electrons to fission it as is done in the sun and
stars, will work to solve energy problems.

You understand, I assume, that all the stars will go dark if E=mc^2 ever >>> fails to be true. Fission depends critically on mass-energy equivalence.

Fission depends upon local or external agencies splitting the nucleus
causing electrostatic repulsion forcefully.

Nothing to do with e is mcc, a bogus concept.

Or indeed if we ever manage to recite the 9 billion names of God (which
God? you may ask.)

All consciousness has divine imprint and can be named individually. No
problem for a robot to recite 9 billion names or more.

All of them of course,

Yes.

Woof-woof woof woof woof woof

Bertietaylor

Jan

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)